Syllabus Entrance
Printer Friendly
Email Syllabus

CJ 105 Criminal Law
Mayo, Keith E.


Mission Statement: The mission of Park University, an entrepreneurial institution of learning, is to provide access to academic excellence, which will prepare learners to think critically, communicate effectively and engage in lifelong learning while serving a global community.

Vision Statement: Park University will be a renowned international leader in providing innovative educational opportunities for learners within the global society.

Course

CJ 105 Criminal Law

Semester

S2Q 2009 FE

Faculty

Mayo, Keith E.

Title

Adjunct Faculty

Degrees/Certificates

Bachelor of Science, Criminal Justice, Park University
Master of Arts, Criminal Justice, American Military University

Office Hours

By Appointment

Daytime Phone

307-630-9361

Other Phone

307-632-3773

E-Mail

keith.mayo@park.edu

elfwinelf@msn.com

keith.mayo@warren.af.mil

Semester Dates

March 16 to May 10, 2009

Class Days

Flex

Class Time

5:00 - 10:15 PM

Credit Hours

3


Textbook:
Criminal Law Today:  An Introduction with Capstone Cases (3rd Edition) ISBN 0131702874 by Frank Schmalleger

Textbooks can be purchased through the MBS bookstore

Additional Resources:

McAfee Memorial Library - Online information, links, electronic databases and the Online catalog. Contact the library for further assistance via email or at 800-270-4347.
Career Counseling - The Career Development Center (CDC) provides services for all stages of career development.  The mission of the CDC is to provide the career planning tools to ensure a lifetime of career success.
Park Helpdesk - If you have forgotten your OPEN ID or Password, or need assistance with your PirateMail account, please email helpdesk@park.edu or call 800-927-3024
Resources for Current Students - A great place to look for all kinds of information http://www.park.edu/Current/.


Course Description:
CJ105 Criminal Law: This course is a survey of the history and nature of criminal law in the United States. Substantive Criminal law, defenses, and criminal responsibility will be studied within the context of the criminal justice process and rules of evidence. 3:0:3

Educational Philosophy:

 My educational philosophy is one of interactive communication based on lectures, peer discussion/participation, regarding current events in the news and in news articles. This emphasis will challenge the learner to engage and explore a myriad of ideas and issues confronting the modern justice system.

1.   The instructor assumes the student has read and understands the syllabus and expects the students to ask questions if any aspect of the course requirements in unclear.

2    This class is in a flex format designed to maximize participation with shift, missile field, unscheduled tours of duty, etc. The first week a firm schedule will be addressed in class designed by the students, for the students.

3.   Students are assigned readings from the required text in advance of each class meeting and are expected to be prepared for class.

4.   Students will be given assignments via the e-companion network.  Students will be expected to check for emails and e-companion assignments from the instructor on a regular basis so that you may be kept abreast of current class issues. The e-companion site is Parkonline.Org, then click on Criminal Justice 100 and follow the instructions for obtaining assignments or current grades.

Learning Outcomes:
  Core Learning Outcomes

  1. Delineate a basic understanding of the historical development of criminal law in the United States, while perceiving the nature and purpose of criminal law.
  2. Demonstrate knowledge of the substantive criminal law, both common law and modern statutes, including the different categories of crimes and the elements of each.
  3. Employ improved ability to effectively gather, evaluate, and communicate information in both written and oral forms


Core Assessment:

Core Assessment Assignment

For use beginning Fall 2008

During the course you are required to write three essays, each comparing a modern state statute with corresponding historical common law for that crime.  The purpose in writing these essays is to examine the historical development of criminal law from common law principles to current state statutes, the relationship between criminal justice and the law, and the social policy implications of criminal law development. 

Instructors may schedule the essays to be collected all at once or at different times during the course.

To complete each of the three essays, you should: 

  1. Write three essays: One essay will discuss uncompleted or inchoate crimes or parties to crimes. A second essay will discuss a crime against persons. A third essay will discuss a crime against property.
  2. Select a state and its statute making an act a crime (e.g. stealing).
  3. Research the historical common law for that crime.
  4. Based on your research, compare the current criminal statute with the historical common law to see how the elements of the crime have evolved.
  5. Write a short essay, 1,250 words or five typewritten or computer-generated pages, describing the elements of the current state statute, the elements of the historical common law, and comparing the elements and how they have changed. Discuss possible reasons for the changes in the elements, how the interaction of criminal justice agencies and the law may have contributed to these changes, and suggest new changes in the statute, based on society’s needs today.

Each of your three essays must include:

  1. A cover page
  2. Introduction
  3. Description of the elements of the crime under historical common law
  4. Description of the elements of the current state statute for that crime
  5. Compare how the elements of the crime have changed from the historical common law to the current state statute
  6. Discuss possible reasons for the changes
  7. Suggest new changes in the statute, based on society’s needs today
  8. Reference page, using APA style

You must demonstrate that you understand the terminology and the concepts used in criminal law. You must write using APA format for all source citations in both the body of the essay and in the reference page.Be sure to review the Core Assessment Rubric.

Link to Class Rubric

Class Assessment:

 Each student is responsible for reading all chapter assignments and to be prepared to discuss chapter contents.  Student essays will be orally presented to the class at a designated time/date, per our class schedule.  Your assessment is based on discussion, exams, participation and attendance will form the basis for your final grade.  There will be two group projects in this course.  The specifics of this requirement will be discussed in the first week, along with the setting of the schedule and essays.
 
A flex class is one that meets a different day each week; agreed by the students.  Class will meet once each week for at least five hours per class.  It is important to attend because of the vast amount of material that is covered in that week.

 

 

 

Grading:

Participation                200

CL Essays (3)            300

Midterm                       200

Group Project             100

Final                            200

 

Total                           1000

Point accumulation for grades:

900-1000 points          – A

800-899 points            – B

700-799 points            – C

600-699 points            – D

0-599 points                -- F

Late Submission of Course Materials:
 Work missed due to military or work related absences must be made up with the semester/term of enrollment.  Work missed because of any other absences or work turned in late will not be accepted.  It is your responsibility to meet deadlines and turn in completed work on time.  There will be a five point deduction per class period for any late assignments for that project.  For example, if you are scheduled to orally present your essay on a given date and for any unexcused reason you present or turn in your paper two class dates later, ten points will be deducted from your term paper/presentation grade.

Classroom Rules of Conduct:
Class members will treat each other with respect and dignity.  Students should come to class properly prepared to discuss the scheduled lesson.  Excused absences must be approved in advance of the specific class to be missed.  Cell phones must be set to manner mode during class. Class will start promptly at 5 p.m., please be on time.

Course Topic/Dates/Assignments:

Week 1, March 16:  Before class read Chapters 1 and 2 
Week 2, March 25:  Before class read Chapters 3 and 4,  and Essay #1 is due
Week 3, March 31:  Before class read Chapters 5 and 6 and 7
Week 4, April 9:       Mid-Term test and Group Project #1
Week 5, April 14:    Before class read Chapters 8 and 9 and 10, and Essay #2 is due
Week 6, April 20:    Before class read Chapters 11 and 12
Week 7, April 27:    Before class read Chapters 13 and 14, and Essay #3 is due
Week 8, May 6:       Final test and Group Project #2

Academic Honesty:
Academic integrity is the foundation of the academic community. Because each student has the primary responsibility for being academically honest, students are advised to read and understand all sections of this policy relating to standards of conduct and academic life.   Park University 2008-2009 Undergraduate Catalog Page 87

Plagiarism:
Plagiarism involves the use of quotations without quotation marks, the use of quotations without indication of the source, the use of another's idea without acknowledging the source, the submission of a paper, laboratory report, project, or class assignment (any portion of such) prepared by another person, or incorrect paraphrasing. Park University 2008-2009 Undergraduate Catalog Page 87

Attendance Policy:
Instructors are required to maintain attendance records and to report absences via the online attendance reporting system.

  1. The instructor may excuse absences for valid reasons, but missed work must be made up within the semester/term of enrollment.
  2. Work missed through unexcused absences must also be made up within the semester/term of enrollment, but unexcused absences may carry further penalties.
  3. In the event of two consecutive weeks of unexcused absences in a semester/term of enrollment, the student will be administratively withdrawn, resulting in a grade of "F".
  4. A "Contract for Incomplete" will not be issued to a student who has unexcused or excessive absences recorded for a course.
  5. Students receiving Military Tuition Assistance or Veterans Administration educational benefits must not exceed three unexcused absences in the semester/term of enrollment. Excessive absences will be reported to the appropriate agency and may result in a monetary penalty to the student.
  6. Report of a "F" grade (attendance or academic) resulting from excessive absence for those students who are receiving financial assistance from agencies not mentioned in item 5 above will be reported to the appropriate agency.

Park University 2008-2009 Undergraduate Catalog Page 89-90

Disability Guidelines:
Park University is committed to meeting the needs of all students that meet the criteria for special assistance. These guidelines are designed to supply directions to students concerning the information necessary to accomplish this goal. It is Park University's policy to comply fully with federal and state law, including Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, regarding students with disabilities. In the case of any inconsistency between these guidelines and federal and/or state law, the provisions of the law will apply. Additional information concerning Park University's policies and procedures related to disability can be found on the Park University web page: http://www.park.edu/disability .



Rubric

CompetencyExceeds Expectation (3)Meets Expectation (2)Does Not Meet Expectation (1)No Evidence (0)
Evaluation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
Outcomes
1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Appraises the sources into congruous and thoughtful conclusions - thoughtful implies some original thinking Appraises the sources into congruous conclusions Appraises the sources into conclusions Evaluation is not present in artifact 
Synthesis                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
Outcomes
2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Combines common law and statutes into a consistent whole Combines common law and statutes into a consistent whole Combines two of the three types of sources into a consistent whole Fails to combine at least two of the three types of sources into a consistent whole 
Analysis                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
Outcomes
2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Analyzes key elements from all sources (the text, statute, and common law source Analyzes key elements from the text and statute Analyzes key elements from only the text Analysis is not present in artifact 
Application                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Outcomes
2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
The artifact shows multiple instances and exceptional understanding  of terminology and concepts throughout the paper The artifact shows sufficient and satisfactory use of terminology and concepts throughout the paper The artifact shows little and unsatisfactory use of terminology and concepts throughout the paper The artifact fails to demonstrate an understanding  of terminology and concepts appropriate to the profession 
Content of Communication                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
Outcomes
3                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Each section contains sufficient information that make the artifact a model for other students or publishable Each section contains sufficient information that make the artifact easily readable and understandable The artifact is readable and understandable but it is  sometimes difficult to transition from one section to another The relationship is hard to understand.  The artifact is difficult to read. 
Technical Skill in Communicating                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
Outcomes
3                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
The artifact contains fewer than 5 errors in the APA writing convention and in the paper presentation (spelling, grammar, etc.) The artifact contains 5 to 10 errors in the APA writing convention and in the paper presentation (spelling, grammar, etc.) The artifact contains more than 10 errors in the APA writing convention and in the paper presentation (spelling, grammar, etc.) The artifact contains so many errors in the APA writing convention or in the paper presentation that it is difficult to read 
Disciplinary Competency                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Outcomes
1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
analyzes previous laws and cases to decide the current constitutional issue in criminal justice and future implications of the resolution of this issue analyzes previous laws or cases (but not both) to decide the current constitutional issue in criminal justice and future implications of the resolution of this issue analyzes previous laws or cases (but not both) to decide the current constitutional issue in criminal justice, but fails to discuss future implications of the resolution of this issue shows no relationship between past issues and today's world 
Disciplinary Competency                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Outcomes
2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
clearly discusses social policy implications of the proposed solution to the constitutional issue discusses social policy implications of the proposed solution to the constitutional issue mentions social policy no discussion of social policy 
Disciplinary Competency                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Outcomes
3                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
see effective communication sections above see effective communication sections above see effective communication sections above see effective communication sections above 

Copyright:

This material is protected by copyright and can not be reused without author permission.

Last Updated:2/24/2009 4:08:07 PM