Syllabus Entrance
Printer Friendly
Email Syllabus
Standard Version

EN 231 Introduction to Language
Donnelli-Sallee, Emily


Mission Statement: The mission of Park University, an entrepreneurial institution of learning, is to provide access to academic excellence, which will prepare learners to think critically, communicate effectively and engage in lifelong learning while serving a global community.

Vision Statement: Park University will be a renowned international leader in providing innovative educational opportunities for learners within the global society.

Course

EN 231 Introduction to Language

Semester

FA2 2009 HOZ

Faculty

Dr. Emily Donnelli

Title

Assistant Professor of English

Degrees/Certificates

PhD, English, University of Kansas
MA, English, University of Kansas
BA, English w/ secondary certification, William Jewell College

Office Location

Library 410

Office Hours

MWF, 11-2; other times by appointment

Daytime Phone

816-584-6779

E-Mail

emilyd@park.edu

Web Page

http://www.park.edu/deptofenglish

Semester Dates

October 19 - December 11

Class Days

TBA

Class Time

TBA

Credit Hours

3


Textbook:
 Clark, Virginia, Paul Eschholz, Alfred Rosa, and Beth Lee Simon, eds. Language: Introductory Readings.

7th Edition. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2008.

*Other required readings will be on reserve at McAfee Library.

Textbooks can be purchased through the Parkville Bookstore

Additional Resources:

 

McAfee Memorial Library - Online information, links, electronic databases and the Online catalog. Contact the library for further assistance via email or at 800-270-4347.
Career Counseling - The Career Development Center (CDC) provides services for all stages of career development.  The mission of the CDC is to provide the career planning tools to ensure a lifetime of career success.
Park Helpdesk - If you have forgotten your OPEN ID or Password, or need assistance with your PirateMail account, please email helpdesk@park.edu or call 800-927-3024
Resources for Current Students - A great place to look for all kinds of information http://www.park.edu/Current/.


Course Description:
EN231 Introduction to Language: As an introduction to a general study of language, the course deals with the origin, nature and function of language as a uniquely human phenomenon. The history of English language and a survey of approaches to the analysis of languages are important components. 3:0:3

Educational Philosophy:
As the editors of our textbook express, “[l]anguage matters. It is an instrument through which we see and know ourselves and others, and it affects how we experience our world. Through language—in all its modes—we become ourselves, know our own thoughts, and construct our ideas” (Clark et al v). English 231 provides an excellent opportunity to study and reflect upon something we often take for granted: language. Why do we speak and write in the ways that we do? How does our language reflect our identities? How can greater language awareness influence our reading, writing, thinking, and even our social commitments and sense of civic engagement?In this discussion-based, application-oriented course, we will explore various perspectives and methods for studying the English language—historical, linguistic, socio-linguistic, educational, developmental, and so on. Students will be encouraged to pursue those facets of study of most relevance to their interests as writers and as scholars of literature.    

Learning Outcomes:
  Core Learning Outcomes

  • Identify standard components of language: phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics
  • Apply linguistic categories to the problems of language acquisition and dialect variation
  • Sketch the history of English language and translate/modernize selected archaic texts

    MoStep Requirements 1.2.1.1 standards for EN231



      Instructor Learning Outcomes
    1. • Define and practice strategies for close reading of literary and non-literary texts.
    2. • Discuss, in the context of historical language development, issues related to ownership of language and representation of ideas.
    Core Assessment:

    Critical Essay [Core Assessment] 100 points  The Critical Essay in this course will be a major critical paper of no fewer than 5 pages, which will include research and MLA documentation. The project will be completed in the final quarter of the term.

    Link to Class Rubric

    Class Assessment:
    Formative assessments consist of short papers--observation/application projects—that allow students to explore and apply course concepts. Each student will also be responsible for leading class discussion on two topics of interest during the term. Summative assessments consist of a mid-term and final examination, and the core assessment, a critical paper designed by each student to investigate a particular interest related to the study of language.

    Grading:
    Short Papers (4)                                              100 points                                                          

    Mid-Term Examination                                  50 points

    Discussion Leadership (2)                             50 points

    Final Examination                                           100 points                                          

    Critical Essay (core assessment)               200 points (prospectus = 50)

    Late Submission of Course Materials:
    All assignments are due at the beginning of each meeting.  One letter grade will be deducted for each day an assignment is late. Check your schedule for potential conflicts well ahead of due dates, and speak with me ahead of time if you anticipate difficulty meeting a deadline. 

    Course Topic/Dates/Assignments:
    Week One (October 19): Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, and Stylistics: Reading Like a Linguist

    Read: Lakoff and Johnson, excerpt from “Metaphors We Live By” (Clark 451) and Lentine and Shuy, “Mc-: Meaning in the Marketplace” (Clark 173); “Stylistics” (Curzan et al—available in Document Sharing) and “The Argument Culture: Stopping America’s War on Words” (Tannen—available in Document Sharing).

    Write: Short Paper #1.

    Week Two (October 26): Semantics and Pragmatics

    Read: Pinker, “The Tower of Babel” (Clark 235) and Heath, “What No Bedtime Story Means” (Clark 798); Chaika, “Pragmatics: Discourse Routines” (Clark 276) and Fromkin et al, “The Development of Language in Genie” and “Genie: A Postscript” (Clark 652).

    Write: Short Paper #2

    Week Three (November 2): History of English: Overview

    Read: Roberts, “A Brief History of English” (Clark 330); “The Dawn of Language,” “The First Thousand Years,” “Where Words Come From, and “Order Out of Chaos” (Bryson—reading on reserve at McAfee Library).

    Write: Short Paper #3.

    Week Four (November 9): History of English: Old English and Middle English

    Read: Excerpts from various translations of Beowulf and secondary scholarship; selections from Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales and secondary scholarship (readings on reserve at McAfee Library).

    Write: Midterm Examination.

    Week Five (November 16): History of English: Early Modern, Modern, and Postmodern English(es)

    Read: Selections from Shakespeare and secondary scholarship (on reserve at McAfee Library).

    Write: Critical Paper Prospectus and Annotated Bibliography.

    Week Six (November 23): The Study of Dialects

    Read: Pederson, “Dialects” (Clark 341); “Do You Speak American?” (online module from PBS).

                    Write: Rough draft of Critical Paper. 

    Week Seven (November 30): Studies in Dialects: Gender, Ethnicity, and Social Class Perspectives

    Read: Macaulay, “Regional Dialects and Social Class” (Clark 383) and Talbot, “Language and Gender” (Clark 507) and “Discourse Patterns of Males and Females” (Clark 517) and Tannen, “‘I’ll Explain It to You’: Lecturing and Listening” (Clark 531).

    Write: Short Paper #4.

    Week Eight (December 7): The Future of English

    Read: “English as a World Language” and “The Future of English” (Bryson—reading on reserve at McAfee Library).

                    Write: Final Examination. Critical Paper Due.

    Academic Honesty:
    Academic integrity is the foundation of the academic community. Because each student has the primary responsibility for being academically honest, students are advised to read and understand all sections of this policy relating to standards of conduct and academic life.   Park University 2008-2009 Undergraduate Catalog Page 87

    Plagiarism:
    Plagiarism involves the use of quotations without quotation marks, the use of quotations without indication of the source, the use of another's idea without acknowledging the source, the submission of a paper, laboratory report, project, or class assignment (any portion of such) prepared by another person, or incorrect paraphrasing. Park University 2009-2010 Undergraduate Catalog Page 92

    Attendance Policy:
    Instructors are required to maintain attendance records and to report absences via the online attendance reporting system.

    1. The instructor may excuse absences for valid reasons, but missed work must be made up within the semester/term of enrollment.
    2. Work missed through unexcused absences must also be made up within the semester/term of enrollment, but unexcused absences may carry further penalties.
    3. In the event of two consecutive weeks of unexcused absences in a semester/term of enrollment, the student will be administratively withdrawn, resulting in a grade of "F".
    4. A "Contract for Incomplete" will not be issued to a student who has unexcused or excessive absences recorded for a course.
    5. Students receiving Military Tuition Assistance or Veterans Administration educational benefits must not exceed three unexcused absences in the semester/term of enrollment. Excessive absences will be reported to the appropriate agency and may result in a monetary penalty to the student.
    6. Report of a "F" grade (attendance or academic) resulting from excessive absence for those students who are receiving financial assistance from agencies not mentioned in item 5 above will be reported to the appropriate agency.

    Park University 2009-2010 Undergraduate Catalog Page 95

    Disability Guidelines:
    Park University is committed to meeting the needs of all students that meet the criteria for special assistance. These guidelines are designed to supply directions to students concerning the information necessary to accomplish this goal. It is Park University's policy to comply fully with federal and state law, including Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, regarding students with disabilities. In the case of any inconsistency between these guidelines and federal and/or state law, the provisions of the law will apply. Additional information concerning Park University's policies and procedures related to disability can be found on the Park University web page: http://www.park.edu/disability .



    Rubric

    CompetencyExceeds Expectation (3)Meets Expectation (2)Does Not Meet Expectation (1)No Evidence (0)
    Evaluation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
    Outcomes
    1, 2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
    Offers clearly stated personal and critical insights into language and linguistics. Makes adequate personal and critical statements, which are relevant and interpretive. Provides only a report, which lacks interpretation or point of view. Does not submit assignment or does not respond appropriately to assignment. 
    Synthesis                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
    Outcomes
    1, 2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
    Incorporates primary and secondary sources using MLA documentation style perceptively and creatively in ways that provide new insights into language problems. Incorporates primary and secondary sources using MLA documentation style adequately without particularly fresh insights, but still retains personal voice. Primary and secondary sources used rarely if at all and without adequate MLA documentation. Insights are predictable. Does not submit assignment or does not respond appropriately to assignment. 
    Analysis                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
    Outcomes
    1, 2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
    Provides convincing and innovative connections between theory and language. Provides connections between theory and language that are obvious but nonetheless plausible and interesting. Connections remain vague and undeveloped. Critique not supported by close readings. Does not submit assignment or does not respond appropriately to assignment. 
    Application                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
    Outcomes
    2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
    Language and linguistic terminology applied skillfully throughout paper. Language and linguistic terminology used adequately throughout much of the paper. Rarely employs appropriate terminology, misuses it, or omits it altogether. Does not submit assignment or does not respond appropriately to assignment. 
    Content of Communication                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
    Outcomes
    1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
    Skillfully interweaves passages from critical texts and personal statements that illustrate main point of essay. Adequately incorporates some passages with some personal statements that help support thesis, though sometimes strays from main point. Rarely provides specific passages from critical texts or personal research for analysis, or does so without making connections clear. Does not submit assignment or does not respond appropriately to assignment. 
    Technical Skill in Communicating                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
    Outcomes
    2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
    Employs conventions of Standard Written English with grace and style in a well organized, fully developed essay. Employs conventions of Standard Written English adequately in a reasonably well organized and developed essay. Writing shows persistent problems with the use of Standard Written English. Statements are often illogical, incomprehensible; organization and development of ideas do not support thesis. Does not submit assignment or does not respond appropriately to assignment. 
    Identifies specific features of language characteristics                                                                                                                                                                                                   
    Outcomes
    2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
    Analysis fully and gracefully incorporates discussion of specific language features and functions. Analysis occasionally incorporates discussion of specific language features and functions. Does not incorporate specific language features and functions, or does so in ways that show little or no understanding of concepts . Does not submit assignment or does not respond appropriately to assignment. 
    Applies linguistic theory to interpretation                                                                                                                                                                                                                
    Outcomes
    1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
    Gracefully incorporates linguistic theory, which helps to maintain a strong argument. Incorporates linguistic theory adequately in parts of the paper, though the argument is not particularly strong. Does not incorporate linguistic theory, or does so in ways that show little or no understanding of language analysis. Does not submit assignment or does not respond appropriately to assignment. 

    Copyright:

    This material is protected by copyright
                                   and can not be reused without author permission.

    Last Updated:10/15/2009 2:21:01 PM