Syllabus Entrance
Printer Friendly
Email Syllabus
Education Major Version

PS 221 Adolescent Psychology
Black, Charles A.


Mission Statement: The mission of Park University, an entrepreneurial institution of learning, is to provide access to academic excellence, which will prepare learners to think critically, communicate effectively and engage in lifelong learning while serving a global community.

Vision Statement: Park University will be a renowned international leader in providing innovative educational opportunities for learners within the global society.

Course

PS 221 Adolescent Psychology

Semester

S1QQ 2011 HI

Faculty

Black, Charles A.

Title

Senior Instructor

Degrees/Certificates

Master of Educational Psychology
Bachelor of Science, Business & Health Science

Office Location

Hill AFB, Utah

Office Hours

0800 - 1600 hours

Daytime Phone

801-731-6117

Other Phone

801-390-3978

E-Mail

charles.black@park.edu

charles.black@baesystems.com

Semester Dates

January 19, 2011 - March 5, 2011

Class Days

--T-R--

Class Time

4:30 - 7:15 PM

Prerequisites

None

Credit Hours

3


Textbook:
Santrock, John W., Adolescence, 12th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, 2008.

Textbooks can be purchased through the MBS bookstore

Textbooks can be purchased through the Parkville Bookstore

Additional Resources:
Weber State University Library, Ogden, Utah

McAfee Memorial Library - Online information, links, electronic databases and the Online catalog. Contact the library for further assistance via email or at 800-270-4347.
Career Counseling - The Career Development Center (CDC) provides services for all stages of career development.  The mission of the CDC is to provide the career planning tools to ensure a lifetime of career success.
Park Helpdesk - If you have forgotten your OPEN ID or Password, or need assistance with your PirateMail account, please email helpdesk@park.edu or call 800-927-3024
Resources for Current Students - A great place to look for all kinds of information http://www.park.edu/Current/.


Course Description:
PS 221 Adolescent Psychology: (EDM/EDS 221) Developmental factors and problems common to the period from puberty to adulthood. Topics include: self-identity, sexuality, life-styles, parent-adolescent relationships, and conditions leading to optimal development. 3:0:3

Educational Philosophy:
This instructor's philosophy is one of interactive exchange with students by presenting the course material in a way that is clearly understood so each student can see how this learning applies to their lives and the lives of those around them. The course content is presented by lecture from the material provided by the textbook with open discussion encouraged. The sudents will be tested on each chapter. The instructor will also employ readings, videos and internet sources to supplelment the textbook.

Learning Outcomes:
  Core Learning Outcomes

  1. Summarize, compare, evaluate and apply the theories and contexts of adolescent development. (Program Competency 1 & 4)
  2. Describe and explain the biological, cognitive, social, emotional, and personality processes of adolescent development. (Program Competency 1)
  3. Critically examine such topics as self-identity, sexuality, life-styles, parent-adolescent relationships, and conditions leading to optimal development and problems in adolescence. (Program Competency 1, 4, 5, & 6)
  4. Demonstrate high quality written and/or oral communication skills through interaction with other students and the instructor utilizing the terms and concepts of adolescent psychology. (Program Competency 4 & 7)
  5. Explain why the study and understanding of adolescent development has value for one's personal use. (Program Competency 8)
  6. Identify public policy that influences the lives of adolescents. (Program Competency 3, 9 & 10)


Core Assessment:

This assignment will give you the opportunity to research, analyze, and evaluate a program that has been designed to either prevent adolescent problems or enhance adolescent development. You will apply the theories and concepts you have learned throughout the term to this evaluation. You will use various sources of information including empirical articles, and the Internet. The paper will be formatted in APA style, double-spaced and 6-9 pages in length (1- inch margins, 12-point font) excluding title page, references, and appendices. The questions posed below are suggestions and should be used as a guide to your writing – substitutions and additions are welcome.

The paper should include the following sections:

I.          Introduction to the paper

II.         Describe the program you have chose for analysis in detail – include:

                        The context of delivery,

                        The population that it services (specific attention to cultural relevance),

                        The type of funding the program receives,

                        The goals of the program, etc.

III.       Background on why this program is important for adolescent development.

                        What theories apply to this topic?

                        What concepts apply to this topic?

                        What developmental tasks does this program address?

                        What are the cultural implications of this issue?

                        How does this program help adolescents develop in healthy ways?

IV.       Empirical research on this program and similar programs

                        What studies have been done on this program if any?

                        What studies have been done on similar programs?

                        What studies say about how this type of program should be set up, etc.?

V.        Your own evaluation of this program

                        What are the strengths of this program?

                        What are the weaknesses of this program?

                        How would you change this program to better service the needs of adolescents?

Link to Class Rubric

Class Assessment:

Four Multiple Choice Examinations, Homework, Core Assessment, and Class Participation

Grading:

Four Multiple Choice Examinations worth 100 points each for 400 points.
Homework is worth 100 points.
Class Participation is worth 50 points. 
Core Assessment is worth 130 points.
Total of 650 possible points.
Grades will be determined as follows: A = 90 - 100%, B = 80 - 89%, C = 70 - 79%, D = 60 - 69%, F = 59 or lower.

Late Submission of Course Materials:

Alternate Examinations will be given if the Exam is not taken per schedule.

Classroom Rules of Conduct:
Respect for classmates and Instructor is expected. Timeliness for class start and return from breaks is appreciated.

Course Topic/Dates/Assignments:

              

Session Date  

Lecture and Discussion    

Read and Study

Examinations

One/Jan 11

Chapter 1

Chapter 1

 

Two/Jan 13

                       2

2

 

Three/Jan 18

3

3

 

Four/Jan 20

4

4

 

Five/Jan 25

5

5

1 - 4

Six/Jan 27

6

6

 

Seven/Feb 1

7

7

Eight/Feb 3
Nine/Feb 8
Ten?Feb 10
Eleven/Feb 15
Twelve/Feb 17
Thirteen/Feb 22
Fourteen/Feb 24
Fifteen/Mar 1
Sixteen/Mar 3
 
8
                     9
                     10
                     11
                     12
                     13
                     14
                     15
 8
              9
            10
            11
            12
            13
            14
            15
5 - 8
 
 
 
 
      9 - 12
 
Paper Due
Final Exam

Academic Honesty:
Academic integrity is the foundation of the academic community. Because each student has the primary responsibility for being academically honest, students are advised to read and understand all sections of this policy relating to standards of conduct and academic life. Park University students and faculty members are encouraged to take advantage of the University resources available for learning about academic honesty (www.park.edu/current or http://www.park.edu/faculty/).from Park University 2010-2011 Undergraduate Catalog Page 92

Plagiarism:
Plagiarism involves the use of quotations without quotation marks, the use of quotations without indication of the source, the use of another's idea without acknowledging the source, the submission of a paper, laboratory report, project, or class assignment (any portion of such) prepared by another person, or incorrect paraphrasing. from Park University 2010-2011 Undergraduate Catalog Page 92-93

Attendance Policy:
Instructors are required to maintain attendance records and to report absences via the online attendance reporting system.

  1. The instructor may excuse absences for valid reasons, but missed work must be made up within the semester/term of enrollment.
  2. Work missed through unexcused absences must also be made up within the semester/term of enrollment, but unexcused absences may carry further penalties.
  3. In the event of two consecutive weeks of unexcused absences in a semester/term of enrollment, the student will be administratively withdrawn, resulting in a grade of "F".
  4. A "Contract for Incomplete" will not be issued to a student who has unexcused or excessive absences recorded for a course.
  5. Students receiving Military Tuition Assistance or Veterans Administration educational benefits must not exceed three unexcused absences in the semester/term of enrollment. Excessive absences will be reported to the appropriate agency and may result in a monetary penalty to the student.
  6. Report of a "F" grade (attendance or academic) resulting from excessive absence for those students who are receiving financial assistance from agencies not mentioned in item 5 above will be reported to the appropriate agency.

Park University 2010-2011 Undergraduate Catalog Page 95-96

Disability Guidelines:
Park University is committed to meeting the needs of all students that meet the criteria for special assistance. These guidelines are designed to supply directions to students concerning the information necessary to accomplish this goal. It is Park University's policy to comply fully with federal and state law, including Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, regarding students with disabilities. In the case of any inconsistency between these guidelines and federal and/or state law, the provisions of the law will apply. Additional information concerning Park University's policies and procedures related to disability can be found on the Park University web page: http://www.park.edu/disability .



Rubric

CompetencyExceeds Expectation (3)Meets Expectation (2)Does Not Meet Expectation (1)No Evidence (0)
Terminology                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Outcomes
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Accurately uses 5 or more adolescent psychology concepts





 
Accurately uses 4 adolescent psychology concepts





 
Accurately uses 1-3 adolescent psychology concepts


 





 
Uses no adolescent psychology terms accurately





 
Program description                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
Outcomes
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Describes program using 3 or more explicit statements.





 
Describes program using 2 explicit statements Describes program using 1 explicit statement Either does not describe program, or description is incoherent and NOT understandable





 
Application                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Outcomes
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Correctly applies 3 or more relevant theories








 
Correctly applies 2 relevant theories











 
Correctly applies 1 relevant theory











 
Correctly applies 0 relevant theories








 
Analysis                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
Outcomes
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Cites 3 research articles and shows how the findings support the conclusions  in the paper Cites 2 research articles and shows how the findings support the conclusions  in the paper Cites 1 research articles and shows how the findings support the conclusions  in the paper Fails to provide any evidence from research articles 
Evaluation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
Outcomes
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Offers a critique of the program including more than 3 strengths and more than 3 weaknesses Offers a critique of the program including 2 strengths and 2 weaknesses











 
Offers a critique of the program including 1 strength and 1 weakness











 
Offers NO reasonable critic of the program  








 
Synthesis                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
Outcomes
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Integrates information from relevant sources to form a coherent evaluative statement about the program/topic; offering more than 2 suggestions  for improvement to program Integrates information from relevant sources to form a coherent evaluative statement about the program/topic; offering more 2 suggestions  for improvement to program





 
Integration of information from relevant sources to form an  evaluative statement about the program/topic is either not relevant or is incoherent No evidence of integration of information OR no evidence of an  evaluative statement about the program/topic 
Technical Writing                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
Outcomes
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Student uses APA style throughout the paper with fewer than 3 errors Student uses APA style throughout the paper with 4-6 errors Student uses APA style but has 7 or more errors Student fails to use APA style 
Sources                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Outcomes
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Cites more than 6 relevant sources; 3 of which are peer-reviewed, scholarly sources Cites 5 or 6 relevant sources; 2 of which are peer-reviewed, scholarly sources Cites 4 relevant sources; 1 of which is a peer-reviewed, scholarly sources Cites fewer than 4 relevant sources 
Composition                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Outcomes
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Paper has fewer than 2 grammatical errors and is organized and readable. Paper has 1 or 2 grammatical errors and is organized and readable Paper 3 or more grammatical  errors or is not organized and readable Paper has 4 or more grammatical errors or shows little evidence of organization or readability 
Component                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
Outcomes
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Paper length is 9 or more pages (title and reference pages are additional) Paper length is 6-8 pages (title and reference pages are additional) Paper length is 4-6 pages (title and reference pages are additional) Paper length is less than 4 pages (title and reference pages are additional) 
Other Literacies-Cultural Implications                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
Outcomes
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Integrates 2 or more relevant cultural implications Integrates  1 relevant cultural implication Mentions only irrelevant cultural  implications No mention of cultural implications 

Copyright:

This material is protected by copyright
                               and can not be reused without author permission.

Last Updated:1/7/2011 12:41:38 PM