Syllabus Entrance
Printer Friendly
Email Syllabus

PS 315 Theories of Personality
Rodgerson, Brianna


Mission Statement: The mission of Park University, an entrepreneurial institution of learning, is to provide access to academic excellence, which will prepare learners to think critically, communicate effectively and engage in lifelong learning while serving a global community.

Vision Statement: Park University will be a renowned international leader in providing innovative educational opportunities for learners within the global society.

Course

PS 315 Theories of Personality

Semester

F2K 2010 LA

Faculty

Rodgerson, Brianna

Title

Adjunct Faculty

Degrees/Certificates

BA Psychology
MS Counseling
CCPC, CRC

Daytime Phone

207-551-7237

E-Mail

brianna.rodgerson@park.edu

Semester Dates

F2K 2010

Class Days

-M-W---

Class Time

6:00PM-8:50PM

Prerequisites

PS101

Credit Hours

3


Textbook:

Feist, J. & Feist, G. (2009). Theories of Personality (7th Edition). McGraw Hill. ISBN #0-073-38270-1.

Textbooks can be purchased through the MBS bookstore

Textbooks can be purchased through the Parkville Bookstore

Additional Resources:

McAfee Memorial Library - Online information, links, electronic databases and the Online catalog. Contact the library for further assistance via email or at 800-270-4347.
Career Counseling - The Career Development Center (CDC) provides services for all stages of career development.  The mission of the CDC is to provide the career planning tools to ensure a lifetime of career success.
Park Helpdesk - If you have forgotten your OPEN ID or Password, or need assistance with your PirateMail account, please email helpdesk@park.edu or call 800-927-3024
Resources for Current Students - A great place to look for all kinds of information http://www.park.edu/Current/.


Course Description:
PS 315 Theories of Personality: Examination of the major personality theories and contributing research evidence with particular emphasis upon motivation and dynamics of behavior. 3:0:3 Prerequisite: PS 101.

Learning Outcomes:
  Core Learning Outcomes

  1. Describe and differentiate among the major psychological approaches which explain personality.
  2. Define and apply key personality concepts, terms, and theories.
  3. Identify psychologists who have made major contributions to an understanding of personality.
  4. Explain research methodology and the ability to evaluate the merit of personality studies.
  5. Practically apply acquired insight of personality to one's own life


Core Assessment:

PS315 Theories of Personality
Core Assessment

Research Reaction Paper In order to help you relate theories of personality to current research in the field, students will complete a research reaction paper focusing on the analysis of an empirical research article relevant to the study of personality. The research reaction paper should include a summary and discussion of the research article including the following areas: 1) topic area; 2) hypotheses; 3) method; and 4) major results and findings. Most importantly, reaction papers should include a thoughtful commentary by the student. Specifically, not only should students provide a general summary, but focus on a critique of the research question and design, as well as a discussion of how the research relates to other theories of personality. In addition, students should include a commentary about the relationship of the research findings to their own life and personality development. Students' comments, critique, and discussion should form the majority of the paper.

Requirements:

  • Information must be organized, presented and referenced using APA style.
  • Research Reaction Paper should be 10 pages (plus title and reference pages).

Link to Class Rubric

Class Assessment:


AAttendance, Participation & Weekly Class Discussions -Weekly chapters assigned from the textbook will be discussed and all students are required to participate in these discussions in order to receive the full 25 pts per week.  If you miss a class, you can not participate and will not receive participation credit for that class. You will have opportunities for extra credit, as appropriate, detailed at a later date.

 

B.  Exams - There will be two written exams given during this course - a mid-term and a final.

 

C.  Oral/Written Presentation -  Students will review a movie (approved by the instructor) on their own time. All students will submit to the instructor at least 3 pages of their interpretation of the personalities involved in the movie while using therapeutical insights and possible diagnosis of these personalities in the movie.  Students should always reflect their findings using terminologies from the textbook, cited when appropriate.  Students will then present their interpretations to the class as assigned. 

 

D.  Core Assessment Research Paper -  See description of Core Assessment above.


E. Presentation Reflection(s): You will be expected to reflect on 2 student presentations (1 page each) and

Grading:

You will be able to track your grade throughout the term. Grades will be determined by points that are assigned as follows:

Attendance/Participation/Class Discussions
200 points (25pts/wk)
Mid Term Exam
200 points
Presentation (Oral/Written)
150 points (50/100)
Reflection Paper
50 points
Core Assessment Research Paper
200 points
Final Exam
200 points
Total 1000 points

Final course grades will be determined as follows:

A 90% - 100% 900 points and higher
B 80% - 89% 800-899 points
C 70% - 79% 700-799 points
D 60% - 69% 600-699 points
F 59% and lower 599 points and lower

Course Topic/Dates/Assignments:

This course examines how major theoretical approaches address the structure, process, and development of personality. It is designed to provide students with a working knowledge of psychological terminology relevant to the personality field, assist students in becoming critical consumers of psychological information, and promote educated self-reflection concerning one’s own personality. In this course, students will analyze and discuss the application of personality theory to everyday life, and critique the relevance and value of various theoretical perspectives. In addition, students will develop effective critical thinking skills as they learn to integrate, evaluate, and synthesize diverse theoretical views of personality presented from various sources of information (textbook, Internet, supplemental activities, etc).

This course is an overview of the major personality theories and contributing research evidence. The course will examine theoretical differences in the motivation and dynamics of behavior. Students will analyze the major approaches to personality theory (psychodynamic, learning, dispositional, humanistic/existential), critique key personality theorists, and examine research strategies specific to the study of personality.

COURSE SCHEDULE:

Week

Class Meeting Dates

Topics

Assignments / Due Dates

1

18 Oct 2010

Introduction / Expectations

Introduction to Personality

 

Chapter 1

1

20 Oct 2010

Freud

Chapter 2

2

25 Oct 2010

Adler

Chapter 3

2

27 Oct 2010

Jung

Chapter 4

3

1 Nov 2010

Klein

Horney

Chapter 5

Chapter 6

*Presentation Topics Due

3

3 Nov 2010

Fromm

Chapter 7

4

8 Nov 2010

Sullivan

Chapter 8

*Core Assessment Topic Due

4

10 Nov 2010

Erikson

Chapter 9

Mid-term (ch 1-9)

5

15 Nov 2010

Maslow

Rogers

Chapter 10

Chapter 11

5

17 Nov 2010

[Rogers]

May

Chapter 11

Chapter 12

Presentations

6

22 Nov 2010

Allport

Chapter 13

Presentations

6

24 Nov 2010

Trait & Factor Theory

Chapter 14

Presentations

7

29 Nov 2010

Skinner

Bandura

Chapter 15

Chapter 16

Reflection Paper Due

7

1 Dec 2010

Cognitive Social Learning

Kelly

Chapter 17

Chapter 18

Core Assessement Paper
Due 3 Dec

8

6 Dec 2010

Review Final Chapters 10-18

 

8

8 Dec 2010

Final / Wrap-up

Final Exam Chapter 7-18

 

 

 

 

 

Academic Honesty:
Academic integrity is the foundation of the academic community. Because each student has the primary responsibility for being academically honest, students are advised to read and understand all sections of this policy relating to standards of conduct and academic life. Park University students and faculty members are encouraged to take advantage of the University resources available for learning about academic honesty (www.park.edu/current or http://www.park.edu/faculty/).from Park University 2010-2011 Undergraduate Catalog Page 92

Plagiarism:
Plagiarism involves the use of quotations without quotation marks, the use of quotations without indication of the source, the use of another's idea without acknowledging the source, the submission of a paper, laboratory report, project, or class assignment (any portion of such) prepared by another person, or incorrect paraphrasing. from Park University 2010-2011 Undergraduate Catalog Page 92-93

Attendance Policy:
Instructors are required to maintain attendance records and to report absences via the online attendance reporting system.

  1. The instructor may excuse absences for valid reasons, but missed work must be made up within the semester/term of enrollment.
  2. Work missed through unexcused absences must also be made up within the semester/term of enrollment, but unexcused absences may carry further penalties.
  3. In the event of two consecutive weeks of unexcused absences in a semester/term of enrollment, the student will be administratively withdrawn, resulting in a grade of "F".
  4. A "Contract for Incomplete" will not be issued to a student who has unexcused or excessive absences recorded for a course.
  5. Students receiving Military Tuition Assistance or Veterans Administration educational benefits must not exceed three unexcused absences in the semester/term of enrollment. Excessive absences will be reported to the appropriate agency and may result in a monetary penalty to the student.
  6. Report of a "F" grade (attendance or academic) resulting from excessive absence for those students who are receiving financial assistance from agencies not mentioned in item 5 above will be reported to the appropriate agency.

Park University 2010-2011 Undergraduate Catalog Page 95-96

Disability Guidelines:
Park University is committed to meeting the needs of all students that meet the criteria for special assistance. These guidelines are designed to supply directions to students concerning the information necessary to accomplish this goal. It is Park University's policy to comply fully with federal and state law, including Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, regarding students with disabilities. In the case of any inconsistency between these guidelines and federal and/or state law, the provisions of the law will apply. Additional information concerning Park University's policies and procedures related to disability can be found on the Park University web page: http://www.park.edu/disability .



Rubric

CompetencyExceeds Expectation (3)Meets Expectation (2)Does Not Meet Expectation (1)No Evidence (0)
Synthesis                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
Outcomes
1, 2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
Student goes beyond identification of the major theory of personality to address the integration between various theories OR addresses specific, contemporary movements within a major conceptual framework.
 
Student correctly identifies and explains the major theory or theories of personality that underlie the research article.
 
Student inaccurately identifies the major theory OR fails to identify the most applicable theory.
 
Fails to use an empirical article relevant to theories of personality.
 
Analysis                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
Outcomes
3                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Student identifies and summarizes key aspects of the empirical study without including unnecessary or unimportant information; uses their own language to explain technical findings.
 
Student accurately understands and summarizes an empirical research study.
 
Student inaccurately understands the research article OR fails to correctly summarize the key points of the article.
 
No summary of the research article.
 
Evaluation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
Outcomes
3                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Student accurately critiques empirical findings or research methodology by going beyond the presented information to highlight original gaps, errors, inadequacies or unanswered issues.
 
Student accurately critiques empirical findings and methodology; focuses on the concerns that are specified in the article.
 
Student inaccurately critiques the research findings or methodology.
 
Fails to critique the findings/methodology.
 
Terminology                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Outcomes
1, 2, 3                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
Student accurately and consistenly utilizes appropriate personality concepts that demonstrate a clear understanding of terminology.
 
Student accurately utilizes personality terminology to discuss the research article.
 
Student utilizes personality terminology inaccurately OR fails to consistently use personality terminology.
 
Utilizes no personality terminology.
 
Concepts                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
Outcomes
1, 2, 3, 4                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
Student shows detailed insight into the conceptual basis underlying major theories of personality; extends the basic conceptual information to show unique, contemporary or innovative applications.
 
Student shows an accurate understanding of the conceptual basis of major theories of personality as they are applied to contemporary research settings.
 
Student show inaccuracies in their understanding of major personality theories OR fails to utilize key concepts relevant to specific personality theories.
 
Failure to discuss or address the conceptual basis of major theories of personality.
 
Application                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Outcomes
1, 4                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
Student shows extensive insight and self-reflection as they apply the key concepts of personality theory to explain personality development and maintenance.
 
Student provides an accurate description of the relevance of personality theories to their own life and personality development.
 
Student is inaccurate in their application of personality theory to explain their own personality OR provides a self-reflection that is unrelated to the theory addressed by the research article.
 
Fails to provide an application of personality theory to own life.
 
Whole Artifact                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
Outcomes
2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Student utilizes APA style throughout paper with fewer than 3 errors.
 
Student utilizes APA style for title page, citations, references and overall organization of information; student has 4-6 errors in technical use of APA style.
 
Student utilizes APA style but has 7 or more errors.
 
Student fails to use APA style.
 
Component                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
Outcomes
1, 2, 3, 4                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
Body of literature review is 11 or more double-spaced pages, 1-inch margins, 12-point font (title and reference pages are additional) that includes the following subheadings: summary, critique, relationship to theory, self-reflections
 
Body of literature review is 10 double-spaced pages, 1-inch margins, 12-point font (title and reference pages are additional) that includes the following subheadings: summary, critique, relationship to theory, self-reflections
 
Body of literature review is 7-9 double-spaced pages, 1-inch margins, 12-point font (title and reference pages are additional) that includes the following subheadings: summary, critique, relationship to theory, self-reflections OR missing 1-2 specified components
 
Body of literature review is less than 6 double-spaced pages, 1-inch margins, 12-point font (title and reference pages are additional) that includes the following subheadings: summary, critique, relationship to theory, self-reflections OR missing 3 or more specified components
 

Copyright:

This material is protected by copyright and can not be reused without author permission.

Last Updated:10/4/2010 2:09:30 PM