Syllabus Entrance
Printer Friendly
Email Syllabus

SO 302 The Study of the Family
Noren, John W.


Mission Statement: The mission of Park University, an entrepreneurial institution of learning, is to provide access to academic excellence, which will prepare learners to think critically, communicate effectively and engage in lifelong learning while serving a global community.

Vision Statement: Park University will be a renowned international leader in providing innovative educational opportunities for learners within the global society.

Course

SO 302 The Study of the Family

Semester

SP 2011 HO

Faculty

Dr. John W. Noren

Degrees/Certificates

Ph.D., Michigan State University
MSW, University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
BA, Graceland University

Office Location

Parkville Campus, Library 416G

Office Hours

M & W, 9:00 - 11:00 am, Campus Office;  T & Th,  9:00 - 11:00 am, Online & Phone; Other hours by appointment

Daytime Phone

816-584-6241 (O)

Other Phone

816-224-3212 (H)

E-Mail

john.noren@park.edu

Semester Dates

January 10 – May 6, 2011

Class Days

-M-W---

Class Time

1:30 - 2:45 PM

Credit Hours

3


Textbook:
Skolnick, A.S., & Skolnick, J.H. (2009). Family in Transition (15th ed.). New York:
            Allyn & Bacon. ISBN: 0-205-57877-2 (paperback)

White, J.M., & Klein, D.M. (2008). Family Theories (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage
            Publications. ISBN: 978-1-4129-3748-1 (paperback)

Textbooks can be purchased through the MBS bookstore

Textbooks can be purchased through the Parkville Bookstore

Additional Resources:

McAfee Memorial Library - Online information, links, electronic databases and the Online catalog. Contact the library for further assistance via email or at 800-270-4347.
Career Counseling - The Career Development Center (CDC) provides services for all stages of career development.  The mission of the CDC is to provide the career planning tools to ensure a lifetime of career success.
Park Helpdesk - If you have forgotten your OPEN ID or Password, or need assistance with your PirateMail account, please email helpdesk@park.edu or call 800-927-3024
Resources for Current Students - A great place to look for all kinds of information http://www.park.edu/Current/.


Course Description:
SO 302 The Study of the Family (MLL): A study of the family as a social institution and a social group in terms of cross-cultural, historical, and contemporary perspectives. Current controversies concerning male-female roles, sexual morality, reproduction and other issues are considered. 3:0:3.

Educational Philosophy:
I strongly believe that education is transformative. Through education and actually any form of learning, whether formal or informal, our lives are transformed, as we acquire knowledge but more importantly expand our understanding of the world in which we live and our place in it. Learning enables us to grow beyond where we are and to see and experiment with alternative ways of thinking and behaving.

Learning Outcomes:
  Core Learning Outcomes

  1. Analyze and evaluate forms of family as an institution and a social group, as well as marriage and child rearing, as they vary among times, places, and cultures.
  2. Explain and critique major social and cultural differences in love and expectations for marriage and family life
  3. Understand and assess the roles and structure of the traditional family and contrast those with alternative types of family, such as singlehood, child free couples, single parents, same sex domestic partners, blended families, and so forth; and analyze the causes and consequences of this variety for individuals and for societies.
  4. Know the biological, mental, and social aspects of mate selection, reproduction, contraception, and other family planning issues, and explain the consequences of these decisions.
  5. Describe and evaluate patterns of acquaintance, intimacy, communication, and the division of labor within domestic units.
  6. Describe and evaluate the causes and consequences for family dissolution through divorce or death.
  7. Describe and evaluate the causes and consequences of stress, crisis, violence, abuse, infidelity, money, illness, and other challenges for domestic partners and their children.
  8. Explain how the family fits into the contexts of individual lives and societies, and assess how productive balance might be achieved.
  9. Examine current controversies and trends concerning gender roles, sexual morality, reproduction, child rearing, divorce, and aging in the changing family context; and extrapolate those trends into the near future.


  Instructor Learning Outcomes
  1. Compose a definition of the family that reflects the student's understanding of the family today.
  2. Explain why the authors chose the term Family in Transition as the title of the text.
  3. Propose a meaningful answer to the question, are we losing faith in marriage?
  4. Identify the major differences in the approaches to childcare that are employed in European countries and the United States.
  5. Summarize the findings of research on what children think about their working parents.
  6. Define the term and assess how working couples with children deal with the demands of the "second shift."
  7. Summarize the significant characteristics of African American, Asian American and Latino families that distinguish them from white families.
  8. Formulate a meaningful response to the questions, why do women have children when young and unmarried, and how do they describe the children's effect upon their lives?
Core Assessment:

SO302: THE STUDY OF THE FAMILY\

Core Assessment (New for July, 2006)

GENERAL NOTES

The Core Assessment assignment for this class will be a major essay that integrates, analyzes, applies, and critiques several sociological concepts and research findings from this course individually, together, and with additional sources from your own literature review and archival study.

You must incorporate the findings from at least five outside sources of original academic research in this essay.  You may also include additional sources for examples or background information, but only reputable, peer-reviewed academic sources will count toward the reference requirements of your essays.  This means that magazines, newspapers, professional periodicals, or internet sources are only appropriate for examples and illustrations in this project — if you have any questions as to whether a specific source is acceptable for your essay, you should ask your instructor rather than guess.  Also, focus on articles or books presenting original research or theories, not on those reviewing others’ works or editorializing about opposing approaches.  Reference works, textbooks, and literature reviews are all excellent places to begin your search, but you must find and read the original in order to develop your own reaction.  Ask your instructor for source approval if in doubt.

You should also consider incorporating relevant and reputable statistical and other social scientific data collected by researchers, governments, and other agencies and organizations.  A wealth of such archived data is publicly accessible through the Internet, and their use can help you better understand your issue and develop a stronger analysis and critique. Again, if in doubt, ask your instructor for approval of your data source.

If you do not properly cite those external sources that contributed to your work, then you are guilty of plagiarism.  This will not be tolerated and may result in immediate and serious academic penalties.  If you have any questions as to when and how to use citations and references in you essays, please contact your instructor.  Your final essay will also be formatted according to the relevant portions of the American Psychological Association Style Guide.  The main text of your essay will consist of no more than 3,500 words (or about fifteen pages).  While it possible to construct a successful essay in fewer words, this assignment is comprehensive and detailed enough that most students will find it a challenge to successfully address all of its points in the allotted space.  Begin work on your essay early and leave plenty of time for revision to assure the best possible grade.


SO302 CORE ASSESSMENT

Pick one aspect of the modern family, its structure, function, or place in the larger society and culture.  Some possible topics include: the importance of marriage, gender roles, the place of children in the family, sexuality and the bearing of children, single parent families, the employment of parents with children, differences between families of an ethnic minority and white families, the acceptance of gay and lesbian families or other alternative forms, or media representations of the family.  You should feel free to choose another relevant focus for your essay, but no matter what your choice, you should have it approved by your instructor before you begin in earnest.

Find scholarly or official domestic data that identify the prevalence, variation, and trends in your focus issue over the past few decades.  Is there a “cultural inconsistency” between what is actually happening and what we perceive?  You should also find at least one contemporary international point of comparison.  Again, is the actual similarity or difference accurately represented in our common perceptions?  One good place to start is the US Federal statistics gateway site: www.fedstats.gov; the UN, www.un.org, and the World Bank, www.worldbank.org, are two additional good sources for international data; the largest clearinghouse for publicly available academic and organizational data is the ICPSR at the University of Michigan, www.icpsr.umich.edu; and the University of Chicago’s NORC is one of the largest academic opinion research centers in the country, norc.uchicago.edu.  Consider multiple sources of data, when possible, and compare and contrast the actual data with public perception of the issue.  Pay particular attention to the trends in the data and use sociological concepts and findings from the course and your additional literature review to analyze your issue.  Over time, what about these families has changed or remained the same?  Why?

Evaluate the individual and social dynamics and consequences of your topic at the family and the social levels.  Explain and analyze how larger social trends affect individual family lives.  Try to understand and explain why some families, who share many characteristics with those of your focus, do not exhibit the same properties.  Is this phenomenon having positive or negative (or both) effects on families and the society?  Why?  How?  According to what standard?  Analyze and critique examples of partisan positions on either side of the public debate over this issue, and identify and evaluate your own biases in the matter.  How can the relevant facts, theories, and research help you determine who is more likely to be right?

Finally, what trend do you think we are likely to see in this issue over the next two decades, both domestically and in your international comparison location?  Defend and justify your conclusions.  What public policies and individual decisions would help guide this future trend in the most generally useful and beneficial direction?  Defend and justify your conclusions.

Link to Class Rubric

Class Assessment:
Students are responsible for:

1.      Completing the reading assignments.

2.      Participating in the class discussions.

3.      Participating in the small group discussions.

4.      Completing the writing assignments, including the Research Paper/Core Assessment Assignment.

5.      Completing the in-class presentation of the Research Paper.

6.      Completing the Final Exam.

Assignments:

1.      Definitions of the Family - During the second and last weeks of the class, you are to compose a definition of the family that best reflects your understanding of the family at the time.  Composing definitions at the beginning and the end of the class enables you to determine if your understanding of family changes as a result of participation in the course.

2.      Reaction Papers – The Reaction Papers are to be one-to-two page reactions to some aspect of one of the assigned readings. In preparing the papers, you may chose to comment on what you believe is an important point made in the reading, agree or disagree with a statement or conclusion of the author or offer a related personal observation based on your own experience. You are to submit the Reaction Papers to the appropriate Dropboxes and bring copies to class for discussion.

3.      Small Group Discussions - The purpose of the Small Group Discussions assignment is to facilitate an in-depth discussion of the Reaction Papers and Film Analysis. Each student will be assigned to one of three groups (Group 1, Group 2 or Group 3) and each group will meet once during a regular class session to discuss the responses to the assignments. Group assignments will be announced prior to the due date of the first Reaction Paper.

4.      Film Analysis: Family Case Study - The objective of the assignment is to complete a sociological study of a family portrayed in film using a case study format.  You are to select a movie from a list provided or choose another movie (requesting approval from the instructor to use the film in the assignment) and analyze the structure and functioning of the family through responses to questions that develop the case study.  More information about the assignment will be provided. The Film Analysis is to be submitted to the Dropbox and a copy brought to class for discussion.

5.      Research Paper Topic – The purpose of the assignment is to encourage you to select a topic for your research paper. Follow-on assignments build from the selection of the topic and assist in the preparation of the paper. State the topic, briefly explain why you chose it and describe what you hope to accomplish by writing on the subject.

6.      Research Paper Resources - The Research Paper Resources assignment is to be a critical analysis of five professional articles that are based on research data, not just opinions, and are related to the topic of your research paper.  At least three of the articles are to be selected from academic journals in the Park University online library databases and no more than two may be obtained from books, print articles or websites.  All five may be from the online library databases. The resources must be presented in APA reference format. A format for analyzing the articles will be provided.

7.      Research Paper Outline - The purpose of the assignment is to prepare a draft of the outline that will be followed in preparing the core assessment assignment/research paper.  The outline should include: (1) a thesis statement (what you intend to focus on in the paper/how you intend to approach the subject and what you expect to find), (2) the headings of the major sections of the paper, (3) the country or culture to be utilized for an international or cross-cultural comparison with American families and (4) three academic resources that will be employed in the paper.  The resources must be presented in APA reference format.  While the outline is a draft and may change, it affords you the opportunity to organize your thoughts and develop a structure for the preparation of the paper.  More information about the assignment will be provided.

8.      Research Paper/Core Assessment Assignment – The Research Paper/Core Assessment Assignment is to be a sociological analysis of a significant issue that is associated with the concept, structure, functioning or place of the contemporary American family in the larger society.  It is further important to make a comparison of the experiences of families in at least one other culture or country with the issue.  The Research Paper must be ten to fifteen pages in length (2,500 - 3,500 words), including abstract and list of references, and at least five resources of academic research must be used to write the paper.  The resources are to be properly cited in the body of the paper and in the list of References at the end of the paper using APA Style.  More information about the assignment will be provided.

9.      Research Paper Presentation – In the presentation of the Research Paper, you will tell the entire class: (1) what you wrote on in your paper, (2) the major points about the subject that you found through your research, (3) how the experiences of families in the U.S. compare to the experiences of families in another culture or country and (4) what you think will be the trend with the issue in the next 20 years. There will be no alternatives to the in-class presentation. If you have a phobia about speaking in front of groups then you should probably not take the class. If the presentation is not completed, no points will be received for the assignment.

10.     Final Exam
The Final Exam is a closed book, closed note exam that you will have two hours to complete. The exam consists of 40 multiple-choice questions and 2 short essays. Study hints for the exam will be provided.

Grading:
Assignment - Points

Definition of the Family 1 - 10
Definition of the Family 2 - 10
Reaction Paper 1 - 20
Reaction Paper 2 - 20
Small Group Discussion - 20
Research Paper Topic - 20
Class Participation - 20
Research Paper Presentation - 30
Film Analysis: Family Case Study - 30
Research Paper Outline - 30
Research Paper Resources - 40
Core Assessment Assignment/Research Paper - 150
Final Exam - 100

Total - 500 points

Course Grading Scale

Grade Points

A         500 - 450
B         449 - 400
C         399 - 350
D         349 - 300
F         299 & below

Grading Rubrics:

1.   Definitions of the Family 1 and 2
 
      Points assigned based on whether or not the definitions are completed and submitted
      by the due dates.
 
      10 points possible for each definition

2.   Reaction Papers 1 and 2
 
      Points assigned based on the following criteria:
      *  Response is thoughtful, logical and easily understood - 5 points.
      *  Response is related to the readings and promotes class discussion – 10 points.
      * Response is free of grammatical errors - 5 points (2.5 points if more than 5 errors,
          0 points if more than 10 errors)
      
      20 points possible for each paper

3.   Small Group Discussion

      Points assigned based on the following criteria:
      * Attendance at the meeting of the small group on the designated date – 10 points
     
* Verbal participation in discussion of the assignment – 10 points
     
     
20 points possible for the assignment

3.   Research Paper Topic

      Points assigned based upon the following criteria:
      * Topic submitted by due date - 5 points 
      * Statement of the topic - 5 points
      * Explanation of why you chose the topic - 5 points
      * Description of what you hope to accomplish by writing on the topic - 5 points
 
      20 points possible for the assignment

4.   Class Participation

      Points assigned based on the following criteria:
      * Verbal participation in class discussions – 10 points   
      * Unexcused absences from class (0) – 10 points
      * Unexcused absences from class (1 – 2) – 5 points
      * Unexcused absences from class (3 or more) – 0 points

      20 points possible for class participation

      The rubric for participation, including attendance, will be carefully followed.
      Attendance is taken at the beginning of class. If you are late, it is your
      responsibility to inform the instructor of your presence. If you do not, you will be    
      counted as absent. A consistent pattern of late arrival is disruptive to the class.

5.   Presentation of the Paper

      Points assigned based upon presentation of a summary of the paper in class. There
      will be no alternatives to the in-class presentation
.
      
      30 points possible for the presentation

6.   Film Analysis: Family Case Study

      Points assigned based on the degree to which the responses fully answer the questions
      and complete the categories of the case study:
      *  Summary of the movie - 5 points
      *  Description of the family - 5 points
      *  Gender roles of the adults & parenting and socialization - 5 points
      *  Work, socioeconomic status & education - 5 points
      *  Family struggles & crisis, conclusion - 5 points
      * Writing is free of grammatical errors - 5 points (2.5 points if more than 5 errors,
          0 points if more than 10 errors)
      
      30 points possible for the assignment

7.   Research Paper Outline

      Points assigned based on the following criteria:
      *  Clear thesis statement – 5 points
      *  Headings of the major sections of the paper – 5 points
      *  Country or culture to be utilized for the comparison – 2 points
      *  Three academic resources that will be employed in the paper – 9 points
          (3 points for each resource)
      *  Listing of the resources in full APA reference format – 9 points (3 points for
          each resource. 1.5 points if reference format has major errors. 0 points if no
          reference.)

      30 points possible for the assignment

7.   Research Paper Resources

      Points assigned based on the following criteria:
      * Name of journal or title of website from which the resource is obtained. 10
          points (5 resources required: 2 points for each resource. At least three resources
          must be from the Park online library databases.
 0 points for each resource
          less than three from the Park online library databases.)
      * Brief summary of the content of the resource – 10 points (2 points for each
          summary)
      * Statement of how the information has application to the topic of your
          research paper – 10 points (2 points for each statement)
      * Listing of the resource in full APA reference format – 10 points (2 points possible
          for each citation. 1 point if citation has major errors. 0 points if no reference.)
     
      40 points possible for the assignment

9.   Research Paper/Core Assessment Assignment

      Points assigned based upon the Research Paper/Core Assessment Assignment
      Grading Criteria.
      
      150 points possible for the paper

10. Final Exam

      Points assigned based on the following criteria:
      *  40 multiple-choice questions – 2 points for each question
      *  2 short essay questions – 10 points for each question
      
      100 points possible for the exam

Late Submission of Course Materials:
With regard to the assignments, the syllabus specifies when they are due and I would like the writing assignments to be submitted as Word compatible documents (rtf is acceptable).  I will accept assignments if they are late, but your score on the assignment is determined and then reduced by 50%.  Assignments will not be accepted nor will credit be granted for assignments submitted after the end of the class.  There are no provisions for extra credit.

Classroom Rules of Conduct:
The course deals with topics that may be sensitive and perhaps even controversial to some members of the class.  This is a university class; it is appropriate to deal with important issues and to do so in a responsible, fair and open-minded manner.  Remember, everyone deserves our respect when they share their opinions and comments, even if the opinions differ significantly from ours.  I do not anticipate any problems with rudeness in our class and I want everyone to know that the conventions of classroom etiquette will be carefully observed.  Failure to conform to university standards of conduct will result in removal from the course and other possible disciplinary action.

Course Topic/Dates/Assignments:
Monday, January 10

     Discussion Topics – Course Overview, Review of Syllabus, Course Texts, Course
     eCompanion, Definition of Family 1, Introductions

Wednesday, January 12

     Reading Assignment – White & Klein: Chapter 1, Skolnick & Skolnick: Introduction
     to the Text

     Discussion Topics – Reaction Paper 1, Small Group Discussions, Philosophies of
     Science, Theories about Families, Family in Transition

Monday, January 17

     Holiday

Wednesday, January 19

     Definition of Family 1 Due

    
Reading Assignment – Skolnick & Skolnick: Readings 1, 3 & 4
     Discussion Topics – The Theoretical Importance of Families, The Life Course
     Revolution, The Family in Trouble: Since When? For Whom?
              
Monday, January 24

     Reading Assignment – White & Klein: Chapter 2, Skolnick & Skolnick: Readings 5 &
     7

    
Discussion Topics – Film Analysis, Functionalist Theory, The Mommy Wars,
     Destined for Equality

Wednesday, January 26

     Reaction Paper 1 Due

     Small Group Discussion 1
          
Monday, January 31

     Reading Assignment – Skolnick & Skolnick: Reading 8

     Discussion Topics –What Do Men and Women Want?

     Video - Killing Us Softly 3
    
Wednesday, February 2

     Reading Assignment – Skolnick & Skolnick: Readings 11 & 12

    
Discussion Topics – Reaction Paper 2, The Decline of the Date and the Rise of the
     College Hookup, Cohabitation

Monday, February 7

     Film Analysis: Family Case Study Due

     Small Group Discussion 2

Wednesday, February 9

     Reading Assignment - White & Klein: Chapter 3, Skolnick & Skolnick: Reading 14

     Discussion Topics - Social Exchange & Rational Choice Theory, American Marriage
     in the Early Twenty-First Century

Monday, February 14

    
Reading Assignment – Skolnick & Skolnick: Reading 15 & 17

     Discussion Topics – Research Paper, Research Paper Topic, Grounds for Marriage:
     How relationships Succeed or Fail, Children's Adjustment Following Divorce

Wednesday, February 16

     Reaction Paper 2 Due

 
    Small Group Discussion 3

Monday, February 21

     Holiday

Wednesday, February 23

     Reading Assignment – Skolnick & Skolnick: Readings 18 & 21

     Discussion Topics – The Modern American Stepfamily, The Four Facets of
     Fatherhood

Monday, February 28

     Video – The Vanishing Father

Wednesday, March 2

     Research Paper Topic Due

     Reading Assignment – White & Klein: Chapter 4, Skolnick & Skolnick: Reading 25

    
Discussion Topics - Research Paper, Research Paper Resources, Online Library
     Databases, APA Style, Symbolic Interaction Theory, A Longer Road to Adulthood

Monday - Friday, March 7 - 11

     Spring Break

Monday, March 14

     Reading Assignment – White & Klein: Chapter 5, Skolnick & Skolnick: Readings 20
     & 22

     Discussion Topics – Research Paper Resources, Family Life Course Development
     Theory, Caring for Our Young: Child Care in Europe and the United States, Beyond
     Sentimentality: American Childhood as a Social and Cultural Construct

Wednesday, March 16

     Reading Assignment – Skolnick & Skolnick: Readings 26, 29 & 31                      

     Discussion Topics – Research Paper, Research Paper Outline, The Second Shift,
     Families on the Fault Line, Why Middle-Class Families Are Going Broke,

Monday, March 21

     Discussion Topic - Research Paper Outline

     Video - Surviving the Good Times, Part 1

Wednesday, March 23

     Research Paper Resources Due

     Video - Surviving the Good Times, Part 2


Monday, March 28

     Reading Assignment - White & Klein: Chapter 6, Skolnick & Skolnick: Readings 32
     & 33

     Discussion Topics – Systems Theory, Diversity within African American Families,
     Diversity within Latino Families

Wednesday, March 30


     Reading Assignment – White & Klein: Chapter 7, Skolnick & Skolnick: Reading 35

     Discussion Topics – Research Paper, Research Paper Presentations, Conflict Theory,
     Gay and Lesbian Families

Monday, April 4

     Research Paper Outline Due

     Video - When the Bough Breaks

Wednesday, April 6

     Reading Assignment – Resource on Asian Families, Skolnick & Skolnick: Reading 34       
   
     Discussion Topics – Asian Families, Cultural Diversity and Aging Families,

Monday, April 11

     Reading Assignment – White & Klein: Chapter 8, Skolnick & Skolnick: Reading 36
     & 37

     Discussion Topics - Definition of Family 2, Feminist Theory & Poststructuralism,
     Prisoner's Families, Unmarried with Children

Wednesday, April 13

     Reading Assignment – Skolnick & Skolnick: Reading 38

     Discussion Topics – Research Paper Presentations, Domestic Violence

     Video - Women in the Third World
    
Monday, April 18

     Research Paper Due
    
     Presentations of Research Papers

Wednesday, April 20

     Presentations of Research Papers

Monday, April 25

     Definition of Family 2 Due

     Presentations of Research Papers

Wednesday, April 27

     Presentations of Research Papers

Wednesday, May 4, 1:00 pm

     Final Exam

The instructor reserves the right to change the schedule with appropriate notification of students.

Academic Honesty:
Academic integrity is the foundation of the academic community. Because each student has the primary responsibility for being academically honest, students are advised to read and understand all sections of this policy relating to standards of conduct and academic life. Park University students and faculty members are encouraged to take advantage of the University resources available for learning about academic honesty (www.park.edu/current or http://www.park.edu/faculty/).from Park University 2010-2011 Undergraduate Catalog Page 92

Plagiarism:
Plagiarism involves the use of quotations without quotation marks, the use of quotations without indication of the source, the use of another's idea without acknowledging the source, the submission of a paper, laboratory report, project, or class assignment (any portion of such) prepared by another person, or incorrect paraphrasing. from Park University 2010-2011 Undergraduate Catalog Page 92-93
This course requires a considerable amount of writing, as is appropriate for an upper division, Liberal Learnings course. Your writing must be your own and all sources must be documented. The use of commercially prepared term papers or copying and pasting papers from the internet is, of course, unacceptable and I will check the authenticity of papers through the use of online plagiarism detection programs. Consequences for plagiarism may include: request to redo the assignment, zero points for the assignment, failure of the course and referral for disciplinary action including expulsion from the university.

Attendance Policy:
Instructors are required to maintain attendance records and to report absences via the online attendance reporting system.

  1. The instructor may excuse absences for valid reasons, but missed work must be made up within the semester/term of enrollment.
  2. Work missed through unexcused absences must also be made up within the semester/term of enrollment, but unexcused absences may carry further penalties.
  3. In the event of two consecutive weeks of unexcused absences in a semester/term of enrollment, the student will be administratively withdrawn, resulting in a grade of "F".
  4. A "Contract for Incomplete" will not be issued to a student who has unexcused or excessive absences recorded for a course.
  5. Students receiving Military Tuition Assistance or Veterans Administration educational benefits must not exceed three unexcused absences in the semester/term of enrollment. Excessive absences will be reported to the appropriate agency and may result in a monetary penalty to the student.
  6. Report of a "F" grade (attendance or academic) resulting from excessive absence for those students who are receiving financial assistance from agencies not mentioned in item 5 above will be reported to the appropriate agency.

Park University 2010-2011 Undergraduate Catalog Page 95-96
Instructors must record attendance in all Park University courses and may not retroactively correct attendance records. Attendance will be taken at the beginning of class. If you are late, it is your responsibility to inform the instructor of your presence.  If you do not, you will be counted as absent.  A consistent pattern of late arrival is disruptive to the class. If you must be absent from class, let me know by email or phone. My email addresses and phone numbers are listed at the beginning of the syllabus. If you do not inform me in advance, your absence from class will be marked as unexcused. Problems with attendance will be dealt with according to the policy statement above.

Disability Guidelines:
Park University is committed to meeting the needs of all students that meet the criteria for special assistance. These guidelines are designed to supply directions to students concerning the information necessary to accomplish this goal. It is Park University's policy to comply fully with federal and state law, including Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, regarding students with disabilities. In the case of any inconsistency between these guidelines and federal and/or state law, the provisions of the law will apply. Additional information concerning Park University's policies and procedures related to disability can be found on the Park University web page: http://www.park.edu/disability .

Additional Information:
Use of the Course eCompanion:



The course eCompanion is a significant asset to the teaching and learning that occurs in SO302. We will make extensive use of the eCompanion and you will post all writing assignments to the appropriate Dropboxes. It is your responsibility to ensure that an assignment appears in the Dropbox. If it is present, I have received it; if it is not present, it has not been received. Points earned for each assignment will posted in the Gradebook. Be sure to periodically check Doc Sharing and the Webliography, both contain important information that will facilitate completion of course requirements. The majority of the instructor's lecture notes will be posted under the weeks of the course.



The instructor reserves the right to change the syllabus with appropriate notification of students.





Rubric

CompetencyExceeds Expectation (3)Meets Expectation (2)Does Not Meet Expectation (1)No Evidence (0)
Evaluation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
Outcomes
1, 2, 3, 9                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
•  Critically, creatively and thoroughly evaluates at least 7 well-selected course materials, and develops more than 1 application or conclusion for each, as used in the assignment.  Identifies and successfully defends at least 2 strengths and weaknesses for each.  All critical evaluation is justified and supported through well-crafted reason and evidence.  Goes beyond assignment expectations in the quantity and quality of critical evaluation.

•  Justifies all arguments through the integrated application of comprehensive and detailed critical reasoning and scientific evidence.  Displays significant creativity and initiative.

•  Reflexively and creatively evaluates at least 3 strengths and 3 weakness of their own and at least 3 others' assumptions, arguments, analyses, conclusions, and applications.

 
•  Critically evaluates appropriate selected course materials, and at least 5 outside academic sources appropriate to the assignment and an upper division course.  Identifies both the strengths and weaknesses of each major concept or position, and justifies their evaluation through reason and evidence.

•  Justifies most arguments (all but 1 or 2) through the integrated application of appropriate and sufficiently detailed critical reasoning and scientific evidence.

•  Reflexively identifies at least 2 strengths and 2 weaknesses of their own and at least 2 others' assumptions, arguments, analyses, conclusions, and applications.

 
•  Demonstrates little critical evaluation (no more than 3 or 4 attempts), or such evaluation presented is inappropriate to the assignment or topic.  Fails to offer a balanced evaluation of some concepts or positions.  Fails to consistently explain and justify their reasons or evidence for all points.

•  Justifies no more than 3 or 4 of their arguments in an appropriate manner.  Fails to integrate appropriate and sufficiently detailed critical reasoning or scientific evidence for each major point.

•  Fails to demonstrate critical reflexivity, or presents biased arguments against those positions with which they disagree or for those arguments or evidence that supports their pre-existing biases.

•  May even demonstrate critical thinking skills, but they are used in the “weak sense” and work only to support their foregone (biased) conclusions.

 
•  Demonstrates no critical evaluation — or makes 3 or more major, or many minor, critical errors.  Modes of evaluation are inappropriate to the assignment and level of an upper division course.  Arguments are unbalanced and demonstrably biased.

•  Fails to offer any appropriate justification for arguments.  Uses little critical reasoning or scientific evidence, none at all, or such reasons and evidence is wholly inappropriate.

•  Is not appreciably critical or reflexive, and may evidence merely seeking to confirm their pre-existing opinions without subjecting them to critical testing.

 
Synthesis                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
Outcomes
4, 9                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
•  Displays particular judgment in selecting and integrating more than 5 outside academic sources (in excess of assignment requirements).

•  Integrates, compares and contrasts differing sources and perspectives without error and in creative and especially effective ways.

•  Incorporates sources from popular or mainstream media or personal experience (in addition to those above) as particularly apt illustrations of course content and other outside academic resources.

•  Draws several accurate, justified, and creative connections among multiple concepts and sources consistently at or above the level of an upper division course.

 
•  Correctly integrates a at least 5 outside academic sources appropriate to the assignment and to an upper division course.

•  Integrates, compares and contrasts differing sources and perspectives with no major errors and more than a few minor errors.

•  May also incorporate sources from popular or mainstream media (in addition to those above), but correctly distinguishes between scientific and non-scientific outside sources, as appropriate, and uses the latter only for illustration and not justification.

•  Draws at least 5 accurate and justified connections among multiple concepts and sources.

 
•  Attempts to integrate at least 4 outside academic sources, but does so with 1 major error or with several minor errors.  Or incorporates outside sources with little or no attempt at their integration or synthesis.  Or with attempts at synthesis not consistently meeting the level of an upper division course.

•  Insufficient integration, comparison or contrast of differing sources and perspectives with 1 major, or several minor, errors.  Or includes only sources on one side of an issue where there is legitimate and obvious disciplinary disagreement.

•  Evidences little, if any, discernment between academic and popular sources.

•  Draws fewer that 5 connections among concepts and sources.  May contain 1 serious error or several minor errors.

 
•  Little, if any, attempt to integrate outside academic sources (no more than 4 sources).  Contains more than 1 major error or many minor errors.  No significant attempt at synthesis appropriate to an upper division course.

•  No significant comparison or contrast among sources and perspectives.  May demonstrate 2 or more major errors or many minor ones.

•  Evidences no discernment between academic and popular sources.

•  Draws fewer than 5 connections among concepts and sources, and those attempts contain 2 or more major errors, or many minor ones.

 
Analysis                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
Outcomes
1, 2, 8                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
•  Demonstrates exceptional command of a full range of concepts and theoretical perspectives presented in the course, with more than 5 well-developed examples.  Introduces at least 2 additional relevant findings or theoretical and conceptual distinctions.

•  Exceptional analysis of a wide range of appropriate course materials (more than 5) and outside sources (more than 2) beyond the assignment guidelines and without error.

• Presents creative and sophisticated reason, logical justification, and exceptionally high evidentiary standards consistently at or beyond the level of an upper division course.

 
•  Demonstrates sufficient command of appropriate concepts and theoretical perspectives presented in the course, and successfully uses at least 5 course concepts.

•  Successfully analyzes at least 5 appropriately selected course materials, and least 2 outside sources, without major error.

•  Identifies and exemplifies forms of reason, justification and evidentiary standards appropriate to the level of an upper division course.

 
•  Demonstrates insufficient command of appropriate concepts and theoretical perspectives at the level of an upper division course, insufficiently or unsuccessfully use the chosen analytic tools, or chooses inappropriate analytic tools.

•  Analysis of appropriate selected course materials contains 1 major error or several minor ones.  May not attempt significant (or any) analysis of outside materials or examples.

•  Uses some inappropriate reason, evidence or justification.

 
•  Fails to demonstrate any sufficient command of appropriate concepts and theoretical perspectives.  Fails to sufficiently or successfully use their chosen analytic tools.  Chooses some inappropriate analytic tools.

•  Analysis of inappropriate course materials or contains at least 2 major errors or many minor ones.  No attempt at analysis of outside materials or examples.

•  Uses inappropriate, insufficient, or unjustified reason or evidence.

 
Application                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Outcomes
2, 8                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
•  Demonstrates and justifies exceptional command of factual course materials (more than 4 instances).  Creatively and effectively employs more than 2 salient outside examples.

•  Creatively and consistently applies course materials to 3 or more relevant personal, social, and historical examples without error.

•  Creatively, effectively, and illustrates and supports all points through well-chosen and integrated relevant examples, details, and supporting information consistently at or above the level of an upper division course.

 
•  Demonstrates and justifies sufficient command of factual materials presented in the course (at least 4 instances), and at least 2 outside sources.

•  Applied course materials to at least 3 appropriate personal, social, or historical examples without major error.

•  Provides adequate illustration and support of all points through salient and relevant examples, details, and supporting information at the level of an upper division course.

 
•  Demonstrates insufficient command of factual course materials (fewer than 4 instances).  Fails to meaningfully incorporate outside examples.  Does not consistently or adequately justify their inclusion.

•  Inappropriate or insufficient (fewer than 3) personal, social, or historical examples.  Any applications, such as there are, may contain 1 major error or several minor errors.

•  Provides inadequate illustration and support of a few key points (no more than 4) or several minor ones.  Examples, details, and supporting information is often tangential or its connection is incompletely explained and justified.

 
•  Fails to demonstrate meaningful command of factual course materials.  Rarely justifies their inclusion or makes serious and consistent omissions (more than 2).

•  Lacks meaningful, relevant, or significant personal, social, or historical examples, or those provided are completely inappropriate to the assignment.  May contain more than 2 major errors or many minor errors in application.

•  Provides little, if any, support for even key points.  Examples, details, and supporting information is lacking, irrelevant, or unexplained.

 
Content of Communication                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
Outcomes
4, 5, 6, 7                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
•  Goes beyond the strictures of the assignment through the use of exceptionally precise, accurate and expressive language chosen for a well-defined audience.  May even successfully integrate the needs of multiple audiences.

•  Is exceptionally well organized, unified, focused, flowing, or has a particularly well-suited opening and closing.  Nuanced and precise control of language.

•  Presents a balanced and thoughtful treatment of controversial research or policy issues, even as it clearly communicates an advocated position.

•  Utilizes technical terminology from the course and outside reseaarch in an advanced, nuanced, and precise manner consistently at or exceeding the level of an upper division course.

 
•  Responds fully and completely to the assignment using appropriate, direct language and expresses its purpose clearly and persuasively for the needs of a defined audience.

•  Well-organized, unified, focused, flowing, and opens and closes effectively.

•  Presents one side of controversial research or policy issues well and completely, and makes a serious (though perhaps not completely successful) effort to communicate alternatives.

•  Correctly utilizes technical language from the course and outside research in a manner appropriate to the assignment and level of the course.

 
•  Fails to respond fully or completely to the assignment.  Language is sometimes inappropriate, flaccid, or confusing and does not express its purpose clearly and persuasively.  Audience is undefined or inconsistent.

•  Lacks some organization or unified argument.  May be slightly unfocused.  Has significant problem with flow or effective opening and closing passages.

•  Evidences bias or makes little effort to communicate serious alternatives.

•  Has 1 or more major, or, more than a few minor, terminological errors.

 
•  Falls significantly short of the assignment strictures.  Language is often inappropriate, flaccid, and confusing, and does not express a clear or persuasive purpose.  No clear sense of audience.

•  Is disorganized, disjointed, unfocused, or stilted.  Unsuccessful or lacking in its opening and closing.

•  Evidences significant bias.  Makes no effort to communicate serious alternatives or digresses into mere opinion or ideology.

• Has 2 or more major, or many minor, terminological errors.

 
Technical Skill in Communicating                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
Outcomes
1, 9                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
•  Has no errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, vocabulary, structure and format.

• Evidences literacy, numeracy, rhetorical, and information processing skills at or beyond the level of an upper division course.

•  Completely and correctly acknowledges and documents (through in text citations and an accompanying references section) all directly and indirectly used sources.

•  No errors in the application of relevant portions of APA format.

 
•  Has no more than 1 major error, and no more than a few minor errors, in spelling, grammar, punctuation, vocabulary, structure and format.

•  Evidences basic literacy, numeracy, rhetorical, and information processing skills appropriate to the level of an upper division course.

•  Consistently, but not completely acknowledges and documents (through in text citations and an accompanying references section) all directly used sources.  May evidence no more than 3 minor problems with indirect attribution or a few small errors in reference format.

•  1 or a few minor errors in the application of relevant portions of APA format.

 
• Has 2 or more major, or more than a few minor, errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, vocabulary, structure and format.

•  Incompletely or inconsistently displays literacy, numeracy, rhetorical, and information processing skills at the level of an upper division course.  May include up to 2 major errors or a few minor ones.

•  Incompletely or inconsistently acknowledges and documents (through in text citations and an accompanying references section) all directly used sources.  May evidence 1 major problem, or a few minor problems, with indirect attribution or several errors in reference format.

•  1 major error, or a few minor errors, in the application of relevant portions of APA format.

 
• Has 3 or more major, or many minor, errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, vocabulary, structure and format.

• Has 2 or more major errors, or many minor errors, in literacy, numeracy, rhetorical, or information processing skills, or fails to demonstrate most of these at the level of an upper division course.

• Has 2 or more major errors, or many minor errors, in acknowledging and documenting citations and references.  May evidence 2 or more major problems with indirect attribution or may misattribute sources.  Reference and citation format is inconsistent or incorrect.

•  More than 2 major error, or several minor errors, in the application of relevant portions of APA format.

 
MULTICULTURAL                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
Outcomes
1, 2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
Demonstrates ability to analyze and evaluate family forms and practices varying among times, places, and cultures with no significant or noticeable errors. Demonstrates ability to analyze and evaluate family forms and practices varying among times, places, and cultures with no major errors and only a few minor ones. Does not demonstrate a successful or consistent ability to analyze and evaluate family forms and practices varying among times, places, and cultures.  Contains 1 or 2 major errors or several minor ones. Fails to demonstrate an appreciable ability to analyze and evaluate family forms and practices varying among times, places, and cultures.  Contains more than 2 major errors and omissions, or many minor errors and omissions. 
CONTEMPORARY                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
Outcomes
3                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Clearly and accurately assesses the roles and structure of the traditional family and contrasts those with alternative types of family with no significant or noticeable errors. Assesses the roles and structure of the traditional family and contrasts those with alternative types of family with only a few minor and no major errors. Does not clearly or persuasively assess the roles and structure of the traditional family and contrasts those with alternative types of family. Contains 1 or 2 major errors or several minor ones. Fails to clearly or persuasively assess the roles and structure of the traditional family and contrasts those with alternative types of family. Contains more than 2 major errors and omissions, or many minor errors and omissions. 

Copyright:

This material is protected by copyright and can not be reused without author permission.

Last Updated:1/8/2011 4:15:08 PM