Syllabus Entrance
Printer Friendly
Email Syllabus
Education Major Version

EN 106 First Yr Wrtng Seminar II:Academic Research & Writing
Carr, Melissa S.


Mission Statement: The mission of Park University, an entrepreneurial institution of learning, is to provide access to academic excellence, which will prepare learners to think critically, communicate effectively and engage in lifelong learning while serving a global community.

Vision Statement: Park University will be a renowned international leader in providing innovative educational opportunities for learners within the global society.

Course

EN 106 First Yr Wrtng Seminar II:Academic Research & Writing

Semester

U1T 2011 DLF

Faculty

Carr, Melissa S.

Title

Adjunct Faculty

Degrees/Certificates

B.A. - English
M.A. - English
M.S. - Professional and Technical Communication

Office Hours

At minimum, I will check our course's Virtual Office once every weekday and once each weekend. I will respond to students emails within 24 hours during the week and within 48 hours over the weekend.

Daytime Phone

615-448-8239, by appointment only

E-Mail

melissa.carr@park.edu

missy.carr@comcast.net

Semester Dates

6/6/2011-7/31/2011

Class Days

Park University students should log into class at least four days per week.

Prerequisites

EN 105 or its equivalent

Credit Hours

3


Textbook:

From Inquiry to Academic Writing: A Text and Reader, Greene and Lidinsky, Eds., Bedford St. Martins, 2008, ISBN: 0-312-45165-2.
 
Portfolio Keeping: A Guide For Students, Reynolds and Rice. 2nd ed. Boston: Bedford, 2006, ISBN: 0-312-41909-7.

Easy Writer: A Pocket Handbook, Lunsford. 4th ed. Boston: Bedford, 2010, ISBN:  978-0-312-65031-5. 

Textbooks can be purchased through the MBS bookstore

Textbooks can be purchased through the Parkville Bookstore

Additional Resources:

 

McAfee Memorial Library - Online information, links, electronic databases and the Online catalog. Contact the library for further assistance via email or at 800-270-4347.
Career Counseling - The Career Development Center (CDC) provides services for all stages of career development.  The mission of the CDC is to provide the career planning tools to ensure a lifetime of career success.
Park Helpdesk - If you have forgotten your OPEN ID or Password, or need assistance with your PirateMail account, please email helpdesk@park.edu or call 800-927-3024
Resources for Current Students - A great place to look for all kinds of information http://www.park.edu/Current/.
Advising - Park University would like to assist you in achieving your educational goals. Please contact your Campus Center for advising or enrollment adjustment information.
Online Classroom Technical Support - For technical assistance with the Online classroom, email helpdesk@parkonline.org or call the helpdesk at 866-301-PARK (7275). To see the technical requirements for Online courses, please visit the http://parkonline.org website, and click on the "Technical Requirements" link, and click on "BROWSER Test" to see if your system is ready.
FAQ's for Online Students - You might find the answer to your questions here.


Course Description:
EN 106 (C) First year Writing Seminar II: Academic Research and Writing: The course provides sustained experience with the research and writing tasks common in the academy. Students will explore various academic genres, with particular focus on learning to undertake academic inquiry: engage in close reading; incorporate research into their writing; and document sources. Peer response, reflection and revision are emphasized through a summative course portfolio. Pre-Requisite: EN 105 or equivalent. 3:0:3

Educational Philosophy:

My philosophy of teaching writing is based on the rhetorical approach to composition (as discussed in Fulkerson's "Four Philosophies in Composition"), which promulgates the notion that "good writing is writing adapted to achieve the desired effect on the desired audience." By helping students learn to adapt their writing to different audiences, she gives them the power to maximize the number of people who will understand their messages. Therefore, helping writing students to unravel the "mysteries" of the writing process and of texts enables them to participate more fully and effectively within their communities, one of which is that of academia. Her responsibility as a writing instructor is to guide and aid students as they work to attain this goal.

The instructor's teaching procedures involve using authentic materials and real audiences in the writing classroom whenever possible. In addition, central to her teaching philosophy are the following principles:

The connection between reading and writing should be exploited as much as possible in the writing classroom. In writing classes, students need to become better readers of their own texts, and the only way they can do that is to practice reading. Only by reading many models of writing produced in and by a society's culture may one fulfill that society's expectations of writing and learn to use that society's rhetorical standards. Also, because people naturally learn and appropriate the rhythm of a language the more they read, their reading helps to improve their writing.

By teaching other students in collaborative activities, students teach themselves. Collaborative activities allow for a student-centered classroom, and, as such, students take responsibility for their work and for the work of their peers. They learn to compromise, to debate, and to work as teams, rather than as isolated individuals.

A writing instructor should consider all types of learning strategies that students may use when she plans classroom activities and assignments.

Individual student-teacher conferences provide an invaluable opportunity for direct student-teacher interaction in writing classes.

Conferences allow a student and her instructor to discuss the student's learning of the writing process in a unique way--the student-teacher contact is open and dynamic and allows the instructor to address directly any problems the student may

Explicit grammar instruction is appropriate when specific grammar points are brought up incidentally by students, but grammar instruction is most effective when included within meaningful contexts. Although class time devoted entirely to explicit grammar instruction can be effective and useful for some writing students, grammar instruction is most constructive for them when they see grammar at work in larger pieces of discourse.

Learning Outcomes:
  Core Learning Outcomes

  1. Develop and maintain a controlling theme and/or focus for a research essay(s) that is fully developed in the use of details and examples.
  2. Demonstrate a range of writing activities in completing writing tasks (pre-writing, revising, editing, proof-reading, and formatting).
  3. Analyze and integrate research resources for essays based on traditional and online research, which include using appropriate documentation practices.


Core Assessment:

Every course has a Core Assessment, which is one assignment given in all sections of the course. For En 106 the Core Assessment consists of one final-draft essay from each student’s portfolio, chosen by the student, plus a Reflective Essay. Written at the end of term, the Reflective Essay must describe in significant detail the student’s strengths and a discussion of opportunities for improvement as revealed in the complete portfolio. The reflective essay must also analyze the student’s overall development as a writer over the duration of the semester/term.

Although all students in all sections will present a portfolio that includes evidence of prewriting and multiple drafts, the Core Assessment will consist only of one final-draft essay and the Reflective Essay.

Link to Class Rubric

Class Assessment:

EN 106 includes the following assessments:
  • Weekly discussion assignments,
  • Five substantial writing assignments, two of which incorporate deep revision,
  • A summative "best works" portfolio including the student's two strongest essays, artifacts related to the writing process, and a reflective introductory essay,
  • Three peer review activities,
  • A final examination.

All graded components of the course include detailed assignment descriptions and grading criteria.

Grading:

You will be able to track your average exactly throughout the course. The grading scale is as follows: A = 90-100; B = 80-89; C = 70-79; D = 60-69; F = 0-59. You will know in advance the standards for each assignment. My goal is to give you prompt, clear, and useful feedback to help you become a better, more thoughtful writer. 
 

WEEK

ASSIGNMENT

POINTS

Week 1

Discussion

20

Week 2

Discussion
Essay

20
50

Week 3

Discussion
Essay

20
100

Week 4

Discussion
Peer Review
Essay

20
10
130

Week 5

Discussion
Essay

20
100

Week 6

Discussion
Peer Review
Essay

20
10
130

Week 7

Discussion
Peer Review
Portfolio & Core Assessment

20
10
200

Week 8

Discussion
Final Examination
Core Assessment Selection
(from portfolio)*

20
100
 ---

TOTAL

1000

Late Submission of Course Materials:
Late assignments will be penalized with a 10% grade deduction for the first week late and 20% for the second week late, unless you have made prior arrangements with the instructor.  No late work will be accepted after two weeks. Deadlines will be defined as 11:59 p.m. MT. If you know you will be offline the day an assignment is due, please make sure to post it early. Any time you feel that you might be falling behind in the course, it is best to contact me to discuss your situation. No assignments will be accepted after the final day of class.

Classroom Rules of Conduct:

Students are responsible for clicking on the link below and thoroughly reading each Online course policy. If you have questions about any of these policies, please contact your instructor for clarification.

Online Course Policies
http://captain.park.edu/portal/online_course_policies.htm

Instructor Contact
Throughout the course, you will have questions about assignments and other matters. You have several channels available to you for communicating course concerns with your instructor. Email is generally the most convenient channel, but you should also take advantage of posting questions that might benefit your peers in the Office area. I will make every effort to respond to all messages and inquiries within 48 hours and return all formal grades within one week of the deadline for completion of the work.
 
Participation
Participation is very important online. Students will be expected to log in to class a minimum of four days per week.

Please note that both quantity and quality are important considerations when it comes to participation. For example, a message which says simply, "I agree" does not constitute participation because it does not add anything of substance to the discussion. In order to earn full participation points, you must add something of substance to the discussion--this would consist of new ideas, your perspectives, pointed follow-up questions, etc. You will find it is much easier to keep up with an online class when you are logging in and participating regularly.


Course Topic/Dates/Assignments:
 

Week

Topic

Activities, Assignments


Week 1


Habits of Mind of Academic Writers


Read/Discuss
: In Greene & Lidinsky, Ch. 1 & Ch. 2. In Reynolds & Rice, Part One, pp. 1-31. In Lunsford, “Find It. Fix It,” pp. 1-10.

Write: Post introduction.


Week 2


Entering Academic Conversations


Read/Discuss
: In Greene & Lidinsky, Ch. 7; and Pratt, “Arts of the Contact Zone,” pp. 354-369. In Lunsford, “MLA Manuscript Format,” “In-text Citations,” pp. 196-203; and “Taking Notes” and “Integrating Quotations, Paraphrases, and Summaries,” pp. 182-189.

Write: Essay #1.


Week 3


Identifying Issues, Forming Questions, and Developing a Thesis


Read/Discuss
: In Greene & Lidinsky, Ch. 4 & Ch. 5; and Loewen, From “Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong,” pp. 332-353.

Write: Essay #2.


Week 4


Finding and Evaluating Sources


Read/Discuss
: In Greene & Lidinsky, Ch. 6. In Lunsford, “Research,” pp. 168-182; and “MLA Style, pp. 196-231.

Write: Essay #3.



Week 5



Developing and Organizing Arguments



Read/Discuss: In Greene & Lidinsky, Ch. 9; Appiah, “Moral Disagreement,” pp. 378-389; and Foer, “How Soccer Explains the World: An Unlikely Theory of Globalization,” pp. 406-416. In Lunsford, “Language,” pp. 138-151.

Write: Essay #4.


Week 6


Responding to and Revising Arguments


Read/Discuss
: In Greene & Lidinsky, Ch. 8 & Ch. 10.

Write: Essay #5.


Week 7


Proofreading and Editing


Read/Discuss
: In Reynolds & Rice, “Putting it Together” (pp. 40-47) and “Preparing to Write the Introduction…” (pp. 48-52).

Write: Portfolio.


Week 8


Looking Ahead


Read/Discuss
: Students will read two self-selected essays from the following three (in Greene & Lidinsky): duCille, “Dyes and Dolls: Multicultural Barbie and the Merchandising of Difference,” pp. 458-47; Ignatiev, “Immigrants and Whites,” pp. 512-519; and Giroux, “Children’s Culture and Disney’s Animated Films,” pp. 567-591.

Due: Core Assessment Selections from Portfolio.

Academic Honesty:
Academic integrity is the foundation of the academic community. Because each student has the primary responsibility for being academically honest, students are advised to read and understand all sections of this policy relating to standards of conduct and academic life. Park University students and faculty members are encouraged to take advantage of the University resources available for learning about academic honesty (www.park.edu/current or http://www.park.edu/faculty/).from Park University 2010-2011 Undergraduate Catalog Page 92

Plagiarism:
Plagiarism involves the use of quotations without quotation marks, the use of quotations without indication of the source, the use of another's idea without acknowledging the source, the submission of a paper, laboratory report, project, or class assignment (any portion of such) prepared by another person, or incorrect paraphrasing. from Park University 2010-2011 Undergraduate Catalog Page 92-93
Any assignment that has been plagiarized will receive a grade of zero, and all incidents of plagiarism will be reported to the University.  Also, you may not submit papers for this course that you have written for other courses. Any student who does so will receive zero credit for the assignment.

Attendance Policy:
Instructors are required to maintain attendance records and to report absences via the online attendance reporting system.

  1. The instructor may excuse absences for valid reasons, but missed work must be made up within the semester/term of enrollment.
  2. Work missed through unexcused absences must also be made up within the semester/term of enrollment, but unexcused absences may carry further penalties.
  3. In the event of two consecutive weeks of unexcused absences in a semester/term of enrollment, the student will be administratively withdrawn, resulting in a grade of "F".
  4. A "Contract for Incomplete" will not be issued to a student who has unexcused or excessive absences recorded for a course.
  5. Students receiving Military Tuition Assistance or Veterans Administration educational benefits must not exceed three unexcused absences in the semester/term of enrollment. Excessive absences will be reported to the appropriate agency and may result in a monetary penalty to the student.
  6. Report of a "F" grade (attendance or academic) resulting from excessive absence for those students who are receiving financial assistance from agencies not mentioned in item 5 above will be reported to the appropriate agency.
ONLINE NOTE: An attendance report of "P" (present) will be recorded for students who have logged in to the Online classroom at least once during each week of the term. Recording of attendance is not equivalent to participation. Participation grades will be assigned by each instructor according to the criteria in the Grading Policy section of the syllabus.

Park University 2010-2011 Undergraduate Catalog Page 95-96

Disability Guidelines:
Park University is committed to meeting the needs of all students that meet the criteria for special assistance. These guidelines are designed to supply directions to students concerning the information necessary to accomplish this goal. It is Park University's policy to comply fully with federal and state law, including Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, regarding students with disabilities. In the case of any inconsistency between these guidelines and federal and/or state law, the provisions of the law will apply. Additional information concerning Park University's policies and procedures related to disability can be found on the Park University web page: http://www.park.edu/disability .



Rubric

CompetencyExceeds Expectation (3)Meets Expectation (2)Does Not Meet Expectation (1)No Evidence (0)
Focus                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
Outcomes
1, 2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
The main point, or thesis, of the essay is not only abundantly clear to the reader, but gracefully expressed in a clear, strong voice appropriate to the topic. The main point, or thesis, of the essay is clear, although could be expressed more gracefully. The voice is appropriate for the topic, for the most part. The essay lacks a main point and instead presents several potential theses. The voice is not appropriate to the topic. No portfolio is turned in or guidelines are not followed. 
Development                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Outcomes
1, 2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
The essay presents relevant and tasteful detail that supports the thesis and provides an appropriate sense of exploration of topic, with attention to ambiguities as well as certainties. The essay presents relevant detail, but needs further explanation. It is not always clear how the information supports the thesis. Ambiguities are not addressed, or are addressed within a rigid framework. The essay lacks appropriate and relevant detail, and emphasizes information rather than interpretation. Ambiguities are not addressed. No portfolio is turned in or guidelines are not followed. 
Organization                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
Outcomes
1, 2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
Details are organized logically, and with a pleasing sense of exploration. Digressions are appropriate and add to the overall argument. Details are logically organized, but are sometimes simply tacked on without adequate discussion or sense of purpose Digressions are sometimes puzzling. The organizational plan is confusing and often irrelevant to the stated purpose of the essay. No portfolio is turned in or guidelines are not followed. 
Content of Communication                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
Outcomes
1, 2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
Central topic and purpose is substantial, relevant, and creatively addressed with fresh insight. Details are carefully analyzed in ways that support the thesis and reveal new perspectives. Voice is consistently graceful, strong, and appropriate throughout. Central topic and purpose is potentially good, but could be further developed. Details and examples are sometimes irrelevant or inadequately analyzed, but potentially good. Voice is good, but prosaic. Central topic lacks clarity and the purpose is not always clear. Details are irrelevant or inadequately explained. Connections are unclear.  The voice does not match the purpose of the essay. No portfolio is turned in or guidelines are not followed. 
Technical Skill in Communicating                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
Outcomes
2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
Writing employs conventions of Standard Written English with grace and style. Use of MLA documentation is flawless. Writing employs conventions of Standard Written English adequately, with only occasional gaps. Use of MLA documentation is fully adequate, with only occasional gaps. Writing shows persistent problems with the use of Standard Written English. Statements are often illogical or incomprehensible. Use of MLA documentation is spotty, fails to follow form, or absent from the paper. No portfolio is turned in or guidelines are not followed. 
Understanding Audience and Purpose                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
Outcomes
2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
The purpose of the essay is abundantly clear through the use of a clearly stated thesis. The writer addresses a specific audience using an appropriate level of discourse and anticipating possible questions. The purpose of the essay is essentially clear, though the thesis could be further clarified. The writer addresses a specific audience, though does not always anticipate reader's questions. The purpose of the essay remains unclear. The writer does not consider the needs of the audience and does not include appropriate discourse. No portfolio is presented or guidelines are not followed. 
Rhetorical Strategies                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
Outcomes
1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
The writing presents information skillfully and uses appropriate strategies and organization. The writing presents information adequately using appropriate strategies, although the organizational plan is not always clear. The writing does not employ appropriate rhetorical strategies and lacks a clear sense of organization. No portfolio is presented or guidelines are not followed. 

Copyright:

Last Updated:5/22/2011 1:54:00 PM