Syllabus Entrance
Printer Friendly
Email Syllabus

PS 407 Field Placement in Psychology
Cowley, Brian J.


Mission Statement: Park University provides access to a quality higher education experience that prepares a diverse community of learners to think critically, communicate effectively, demonstrate a global perspective and engage in lifelong learning and service to others.

Vision Statement: Park University, a pioneering institution of higher learning since 1875, will provide leadership in quality, innovative education for a diversity of learners who will excel in their professional and personal service to the global community.

Course

PS 407 Field Placement in Psychology

Semester

UU 2012 HOA

Faculty

Cowley, Brian J.

Title

Professor of Psychology

Degrees/Certificates

B.S. - Psychology - Utah State University
M.S. - Behavior Analysis and Therapy - Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
Ph.D. - Developmenatl and Child Psychology - University of Kansas

Office Location

Mabee 225B - Parkville

Office Hours

By Appointment

Daytime Phone

816-584-6501

Other Phone

None

E-Mail

brian.cowley@park.edu

None

None

Web Page

None

Semester Dates

June 4, 2012 through July 29, 2012

Class Days

TBA

Class Time

TBA

Prerequisites

major in psychology, permission of the instructor, and junior or senior standing. Variable credit: 3-6 hours.

Credit Hours

3-6


Textbook:
None

Additional Resources:

McAfee Memorial Library - Online information, links, electronic databases and the Online catalog. Contact the library for further assistance via email or at 800-270-4347.
Career Counseling - The Career Development Center (CDC) provides services for all stages of career development.  The mission of the CDC is to provide the career planning tools to ensure a lifetime of career success.
Park Helpdesk - If you have forgotten your OPEN ID or Password, or need assistance with your PirateMail account, please email helpdesk@park.edu or call 800-927-3024
Resources for Current Students - A great place to look for all kinds of information http://www.park.edu/Current/.


Course Description:
PS 407 Field Placement in Psychology: Supervised field placement in an agency specifically concerned with applications of psychology. Variable credit: 3-6 hours. Prerequisites: major in Psychology, permission of the instructor, and junior or senior standing.

Educational Philosophy:
My educational philosophy is based on bringing the student to the table for critical thinking. A variety of teaching methods are employed according to the learning objectives and the available environmental setting. Students will be required to engage, explore, explain, elaborate, and evaluate topics about the history of psychology.

Learning Outcomes:
  Core Learning Outcomes

  1. To examine the role of the student vs. the role of the professional
  2. To conceptualize the opportunities and challenges faced by field placement students.
  3. To discover professional identity in the field through skills and character examination.
  4. To critically analyze field placement roles: the supervisors, the student, and those supporting your field placement.
  5. To apply ethical and legal considerations in the field placement experience which may include but not be limited to: confidentiality, diversity, and assessment
  6. To apply the skills needed to be effective in working with a culturally diverse clientele.
  7. To examine the field placement experience in the context of career/life roles
  8. To demonstrate insight into theoretical understanding vs. applied knowledge in psychology


Core Assessment:
Core Assessment- Reflection Essay Exam

The Core Assessment for the course is a Reflection Essay Exam. This reflection essay exam will be written during your proctored final exam. Students should have filled out the proctor form and made arrangements for testing during Week 8. Students will have 2 ½ hours to complete an open book/open notes (journal notes from course- for example) reflection essay exam.

 The purpose of the summary reflection essay is for students to critically think about their field experience in relation to the core learning outcomes. A reflection essay should take into account their prior educational experiences in psychology, and reflect on each of the eight core learning objectives. The field placement reflection essay exam (core assessment) is worth 31 points distributed as follows (students should examine the full rubric for more clarification/detail on grading criteria):

Reflection Essay Exam: Core Learning Outcomes to be addressed in student’s writing
Points Eligible
Student should competently analyze and Evaluate the following learning outcomes : 1, 4, 3 ,2 ,& 7
14
Students should competently apply the following learning
outcomes : #5,#6,#8
10
Students should competently fulfill the technical quality of the paper and apply outcomes: #1 & #8
7

Reflection Essay Exam General Guidelines:
  • Writing should be a critical analysis of the field experience. Students should not just report issues- but discuss how they relate to their study of psychology over the course of their psychology studies and program.
  • Include an examination of all eight topics approached in the core learning outcomes. Students should identify challenges and opportunities in each core learning objectives (listed above) during the field experience. Students are encouraged to use headings to clearly identify the learning objective areas and their reflections.
  • Students should examine the following: What were areas of personal and professional growth? What insights were gained in terms of the field in relation to your contributions at the field site and sharing with peers online? Reflect upon any lessons learned in relation to the eight learning objective areas in the field and in one’s psychology coursework.
  • See the Grading Rubric for the Reflection Essay Exam (next).

Link to Class Rubric

Class Assessment:

           Discussion/ Approval of placement site with supervising professor.

          Contact organization and discuss field placement guidelines.

          Organization sends an acknowledgment letter to supervising professor.

          Begin / maintain a journal to document the number of hours served and experiences

            throughout your field placement.  (Please record the tasks performed and your evaluation of them.

            (The journal is supposed to be reflective.)

           Complete 135 hours (3 cr.); 270 hours (6 cr.)

           Organization sends a completion letter to professor. This letter should also include an evaluation of performance.

            Submit field placement journal

             Submit Reflection paper (6-8 pages).  This is due no later than the last day of regular classes for the term enrolled.

 

Late Submission of Course Materials:
Any assignment turned in after the date it is due will be given up to half credit for that assignment as negotiated with your instructor. No course materials will be accepted after the last class meeting.

Classroom Rules of Conduct:

  • Conduct at Field Placement site will be supervised by site supervisor.
  • Computers make writing and revising much easier and more productive. Students must recognize though that technology can also cause problems. Printers run out of ink and hard drives crash. Students must be responsible for planning ahead and meeting deadlines in spite of technology. Be sure to save copies of your work to a CD, a hard drive, or flash drive and print out paper copies for backup purposes.
  • The student is expected to have a copy of all written assignments on computer disk, flash drive, or in a hard copy form. You will also be expected to retain all graded and returned assignments and examinations.

Course Topic/Dates/Assignments:
All materials are due by July 29, 2012.

Academic Honesty:
Academic integrity is the foundation of the academic community. Because each student has the primary responsibility for being academically honest, students are advised to read and understand all sections of this policy relating to standards of conduct and academic life. Park University students and faculty members are encouraged to take advantage of the University resources available for learning about academic honesty (www.park.edu/current or http://www.park.edu/faculty/).from Park University 2011-2012 Undergraduate Catalog Page 93
I take academic honesty seriously.  I will actively monitor student work to assure that it is indeed the student's work.  If I discover any academic dishonesty, at the very least the assignment in question will be given no credit.  If it appears that the academic dishonesty in question is part of a larger pattern of dishonesty, I will pursue more severe measures that include the possibility of expulsion from class and from the university.  I welcome any discussion or question about academic dishonesty.

Plagiarism:
Plagiarism involves the use of quotations without quotation marks, the use of quotations without indication of the source, the use of another's idea without acknowledging the source, the submission of a paper, laboratory report, project, or class assignment (any portion of such) prepared by another person, or incorrect paraphrasing. from Park University 2011-2012 Undergraduate Catalog Page 93
When a student comes to me with questions about plagiarism before an assignment is turned in it will not be dishonest.  If I discover plagiarism and then the student asks questions about it, the student will still have engaged in plagiarism which is one form of academic dishonesty.  If this occurs, I will proceed as I would in any case of academic dishonesty.

Attendance Policy:
Instructors are required to maintain attendance records and to report absences via the online attendance reporting system.

  1. The instructor may excuse absences for valid reasons, but missed work must be made up within the semester/term of enrollment.
  2. Work missed through unexcused absences must also be made up within the semester/term of enrollment, but unexcused absences may carry further penalties.
  3. In the event of two consecutive weeks of unexcused absences in a semester/term of enrollment, the student will be administratively withdrawn, resulting in a grade of "F".
  4. A "Contract for Incomplete" will not be issued to a student who has unexcused or excessive absences recorded for a course.
  5. Students receiving Military Tuition Assistance or Veterans Administration educational benefits must not exceed three unexcused absences in the semester/term of enrollment. Excessive absences will be reported to the appropriate agency and may result in a monetary penalty to the student.
  6. Report of a "F" grade (attendance or academic) resulting from excessive absence for those students who are receiving financial assistance from agencies not mentioned in item 5 above will be reported to the appropriate agency.

Park University 2011-2012 Undergraduate Catalog Page 96

Disability Guidelines:
Park University is committed to meeting the needs of all students that meet the criteria for special assistance. These guidelines are designed to supply directions to students concerning the information necessary to accomplish this goal. It is Park University's policy to comply fully with federal and state law, including Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, regarding students with disabilities. In the case of any inconsistency between these guidelines and federal and/or state law, the provisions of the law will apply. Additional information concerning Park University's policies and procedures related to disability can be found on the Park University web page: http://www.park.edu/disability .



Rubric

CompetencyExceeds Expectation (3)Meets Expectation (2)Does Not Meet Expectation (1)No Evidence (0)
Analysis & Evaluation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
Outcomes
Outcomes #  1, 4,3  2 & 7                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
Several roles of the student versus a professional and two other roles in the field experience were identified, critiqued  and evaluated in relation to the field placement experience
(5 pts)-------------
Identifies 3 or more key characteristics of the helping relationship  or discussed in a field experience
(4 pts)------------
The reflection contains an exceptional integrative application of the challenges and opportunities of the field placement Conceptualizes these in relation to their own current or prospective career/life roles is evident.  
(5 pts)
 
Roles of the student versus professional identified and one other role in the field but lacks a rationale and coherence /relationship to the field placement experience
(4-2 pts)-----------
Identifies 2 characteristics of the helping relationship involved in a field experience (3-2 pts)
T________The reflection contains a satisfactory integrative application of a challenge or opportunity but doesn't adequately address them fully with detail Conceptualization of career/life roles is lacking and/or lacks analysis
(4-2pts)
 
Only one role identified in critiquing and evaluated in the field placement --lack critical thinking- merely describes these roles(1 pt)-----
Identifies one characteristic of the helping relationship in a field experience but with little detail/depth of synthesis (1pt)__________ The reflection lacked an integrative application of opportunities and/or challenges. Conceptualization of career/life role connection is not evident anywhere in the essay or seems random.(1pt)
 
 
Application                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Outcomes
Outcomes  #5,#6,#8                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
The reflection presented was exceptional in applying and identifying ethical dimensions/
diversity
considerations and articulating theoretical understanding vs. applied knowledge in a prospective field situation.
(10 pts)
 
The reflection was satisfactory in identifying ethical dimensions/ diversity /considerations and articulating theoretical understanding vs. applied knowledge in a prospective field situation.  (9-2pts) The reflection lacked   appropriate identification of ethical dimensions/diversity/considerations and clear articulation of theoretical understanding vs. applied knowledge in a prospective field situation. (1pt)  
Whole Artifact:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
Outcomes
Outcome #1 &  #8                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
There is not more than 1 mistake related to mechanics (proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling) and not more than 1 error related to APA format
(7 pts)
 
There are fewer than 2 mistakes related to mechanics (proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling) and fewer than 2 mistakes related to APA format (6-2pts) There are 3 or more mistakes related to mechanics (proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling) or 3 or more mistakes related to APA format.( 1 pt)  

Copyright:

This material is protected by copyright
                               and can not be reused without author permission.

Last Updated:5/21/2012 4:59:48 PM