Syllabus Entrance
Printer Friendly
Email Syllabus

PS 301 Social Psychology
Dapper, Karen L.


Mission Statement: Park University provides access to a quality higher education experience that prepares a diverse community of learners to think critically, communicate effectively, demonstrate a global perspective and engage in lifelong learning and service to others.

Vision Statement: Park University, a pioneering institution of higher learning since 1875, will provide leadership in quality, innovative education for a diversity of learners who will excel in their professional and personal service to the global community.

Course

PS 301 Social Psychology

Semester

U1DD 2013 DC

Faculty

Dapper, Karen L.

Title

Adjunct Faculty

Degrees/Certificates

Doctorate in Clinical Psychology - Wright State University
Bachelor of Science in Social Psychology - Park University
Associate Degree in Nursing - Columbus State

Office Location

DSCC

Office Hours

Wednesday 4 - 5 PM

Daytime Phone

614-889-0015

Other Phone

614-216-1714

E-Mail

karen.dapper@park.edu

kdapper@yahoo.com

Semester Dates

June 3 - July 28, 2013

Class Days

---W---

Class Time

5:00 - 11:00 PM

Prerequisites

See catalog for specifics

Credit Hours

3


Textbook:

Kassin, S., Fein, S., & Markus, H.E. (2011). Social Psychology, Eighth Edition. Belmont, CA:Wadsworth
 
ISBN-13: 978-0-495-81240-1
 
ISBN-10: 0-495-81240-4

Textbooks can be purchased through the MBS bookstore

Textbooks can be purchased through the Parkville Bookstore

Additional Resources:

McAfee Memorial Library - Online information, links, electronic databases and the Online catalog. Contact the library for further assistance via email or at 800-270-4347.
Career Counseling - The Career Development Center (CDC) provides services for all stages of career development.  The mission of the CDC is to provide the career planning tools to ensure a lifetime of career success.
Park Helpdesk - If you have forgotten your OPEN ID or Password, or need assistance with your PirateMail account, please email helpdesk@park.edu or call 800-927-3024
Resources for Current Students - A great place to look for all kinds of information http://www.park.edu/Current/.


Course Description:
PS301 Social Psychology: A study of the impact of the real or imagined social environment on individuals; particular emphasis is placed on the role of social and cultural influences on individuals thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. 3:0:3.

Educational Philosophy:
 

The professor’s educational philosophy is one of interactiveness based on lectures, readings, dialogues, examinations, internet, and writings. The professor will engage each learner in what is referred to as disputatious learning to encourage the lively exploration of ideas, issues and contradictions.

Learning Outcomes:
  Core Learning Outcomes

  1. Define key theories and principles relevant to social psychology.
  2. Critically apply social psychological concepts to enhance one's understanding of their own behavior in a societal context.
  3. Identify and critique research methods in social psychology.
  4. Define and contrast key factors relevant in theories of group dynamics, conformity, leadership, obedience, and interpersonal attraction.


Core Assessment:

Literature Review


The purpose of the literature review is for students to research a topic relevant to social psychology, formulate a research question, and conduct a literature review to address their target question. A literature review is not simply a report or an annotated bibliography; a literature review is a summary of the available information on a specific topic organized by common themes, trends or findings.


Requirements:



  • Utilizes a minimum of 6 empirical, peer-reviewed, research articles as the basis of the literature review.
  • Information must be organized, presented and referenced using APA style.
  • Literature review should be approximately 10-12 pages (plus title and reference pages).
  • Includes an explicit section examining multicultural implications, findings, relevance and/or significance.

Link to Class Rubric

Class Assessment:
 

Midterm is worth 100 points

Final examination is worth 100 points

The Core Assignment is a possible 150 points per paper as defined and graded per the noted rubric

Reaction papers with a possible 25 points per (X5 papers) as noted below. The student will respond to one of the readings from the textbook each assigned week. Such responses/critiques should be a minimum of 250 words and provide a critical review of some student selected information of interest contained in the reading. Reaction papers are due assigned below.

Attendance and participation in class is worth 2 points for each class.

Grading:
 



 

Attendance & Participation

2 points possible per class

Possible 16 points

Midterm Examination

Total points possible

100 points possible

Final Examination

Total points possible

100 points possible

Reaction Papers

25 points possible per paper

125 points possible

Core Assignment

Literature Review

150 points possible

Grade of A

100-90%

491-442 points

Grade of B

89-80%

441-393 points

Grade of C

79-70%

392-344 points

Grade of D

69-60%

343-295 points

Grade of F

59% or below

294 – 0 points



Late Submission of Course Materials:
 

As this course is designed to be interactive and requires communication between the student and the professor, all assignments are expected to be turned in on the due date. If an assignment is not turned in on time the student should not expect credit unless prior approval has been obtained from the professor. Such prior approval will limited to exceptional circumstances, preferably verifiable difficulties. This policy is not meant to be punitive but rather to facilitate effective learning. The student must stay current on material or he/she can not effectively engage in dialog with the professor or other students and meet the learning objectives. As such, assignments must be turned in when due so the instruction can move forward as new material is presented. No extra opportunities will be offered for the course, as the existing assignments are very challenging

Classroom Rules of Conduct:
 

This professor will maintain attendance records and report absences via the online attendance reporting system. An absence may be excused for a valid reason. Missed work due to an excused absence will not receive credit as noted above unless prior arrangements are made with the professor for a late assignment. In the event of two consecutive weeks of unexcused absences the student will be administratively withdrawn from the class resulting in a grade of “F”. A “Contract for Incomplete” will not be issued to a student who has unexcused or excessive absences during this course without a verified reason. Students receiving Military Tuition Assistance or Veteran Administration Education benefits must not exceed three unexcused absences in the term of enrollment. Such absences are reported to the noted agency and may result in a monetary penalty to the student. A grade of “F” will result from excessive absences for those students who are receiving financial aid from other agencies not mentioned above. This information will be reported to the agencies supplying the financial support. Please note class attendance or “Present” will be recorded for students attending class, however recording of attendance is not equivalent to participation. Participation will be determined by the assessing professor according to the criteria in the Grading Policy of the syllabus.

Course Topic/Dates/Assignments:
 

June 5 - Review syllabus and Core Assignment (CA). Read for discussion Chapters (Ch) 1-2.

June 12 - Begin work on CA. Read for discussion Ch. 3-4. Reaction paper due on Ch. 1-2

June 19 - Read for disucssion Ch. 5-6. Reaction paper due on Ch. 3-4. Review for Midterm

June 26 - Midterm examination. Read for discussion Ch. 7-9. Present progress made on CA

July 3 - Read for discussion Ch. 10-11. Reaction paper due on Ch. 7-9

July 10 - Read for discussion Ch. 12-13. Reaction paper due on Ch. 10-11.

July 17 - Read for discussion Ch. 14. Reaction paper due on Ch. 12-13

July 24 - Final Examination and Core Assignment due

Academic Honesty:
Academic integrity is the foundation of the academic community. Because each student has the primary responsibility for being academically honest, students are advised to read and understand all sections of this policy relating to standards of conduct and academic life. Park University students and faculty members are encouraged to take advantage of the University resources available for learning about academic honesty (www.park.edu/current or http://www.park.edu/faculty/).from Park University 2012-2013 Undergraduate Catalog Page 97

Plagiarism:
Plagiarism involves the use of quotations without quotation marks, the use of quotations without indication of the source, the use of another's idea without acknowledging the source, the submission of a paper, laboratory report, project, or class assignment (any portion of such) prepared by another person, or incorrect paraphrasing. from Park University 2012-2013 Undergraduate Catalog Page 95

Attendance Policy:
Instructors are required to maintain attendance records and to report absences via the online attendance reporting system.

  1. The instructor may excuse absences for valid reasons, but missed work must be made up within the semester/term of enrollment.
  2. Work missed through unexcused absences must also be made up within the semester/term of enrollment, but unexcused absences may carry further penalties.
  3. In the event of two consecutive weeks of unexcused absences in a semester/term of enrollment, the student will be administratively withdrawn, resulting in a grade of "F".
  4. A "Contract for Incomplete" will not be issued to a student who has unexcused or excessive absences recorded for a course.
  5. Students receiving Military Tuition Assistance or Veterans Administration educational benefits must not exceed three unexcused absences in the semester/term of enrollment. Excessive absences will be reported to the appropriate agency and may result in a monetary penalty to the student.
  6. Report of a "F" grade (attendance or academic) resulting from excessive absence for those students who are receiving financial assistance from agencies not mentioned in item 5 above will be reported to the appropriate agency.

Park University 2012-2013 Undergraduate Catalog Page 98

Disability Guidelines:
Park University is committed to meeting the needs of all students that meet the criteria for special assistance. These guidelines are designed to supply directions to students concerning the information necessary to accomplish this goal. It is Park University's policy to comply fully with federal and state law, including Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, regarding students with disabilities. In the case of any inconsistency between these guidelines and federal and/or state law, the provisions of the law will apply. Additional information concerning Park University's policies and procedures related to disability can be found on the Park University web page: http://www.park.edu/disability .



Rubric

CompetencyExceeds Expectation (3)Meets Expectation (2)Does Not Meet Expectation (1)No Evidence (0)
Synthesis                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
Outcomes
1, 3, 4                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
Identifies and incorporates 7 or more empirical, peer-reviewed research articles that directly address the target research question.



 
Identifies and incorporates 6 empirical, peer-reviewed research articles that are appropriate and relevant for addressing the target research question.



 
Utilizes 5 or fewer research articles OR fails to utilize empirical, peer-reviewed research articles OR research articles are inappropriate for addressing the target research question.



 
No references or empirical basis for paper.



 
Analysis                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
Outcomes
1, 3, 4                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
Literature review provides a cohesive, accurate analysis of the target question by organizing current information into logical themes, trends and findings; literature review provides a clear portrait of the current research status on the target topic.



 
Literature review is organized according to common themes, trends and findings that address the target question.



 
Literature review is presented as a series of unrelated findings/summaries OR literature review does not address the target question OR information fails to show any cohesiveness to topic.



 
Fails to provide a review of literature; paper is editorial, opinion, or personal reference.



 
Evaluation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
Outcomes
1, 3, 4                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
Student accurately interprets and presents empirical findings while going beyond the presented information to highlight original gaps, errors, inadequacies or unanswered issues in the research base.



 
Student accurately interprets and presents empirical findings that correctly address the research question while summarizing reported gaps or inadequacies in the research base.  



 
Student inaccurately interprets or presents the empirical findings OR findings do not address the research question OR fails to note any gaps/inadeqacies in the research base.



 
No relationship between literature review and research question.



 
Terminology                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Outcomes
1, 4                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
Student accurately and consistenly utilizes appropriate social psychological concepts that demonstrate a clear understanding of terminology.



 
Student accurately utilizes social psychological concepts to discuss the research literature.



 
Student utilizes social psychological terminology inaccurately OR fails to consistently use social psychological terminology.



 
Utilizes no social psychological terminology.



 
Concepts                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
Outcomes
1, 3, 4                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
Student proposes an insightful, original research question that utilizes current social psychological information to extend our understanding of humans as social creatures.



 
Student provides an appropriate researchable question that can be addressed within the scope of social psychology.



 
Student provides a philosophical or unanswerable question OR utilizes a research question that cannot be addressed from a social psychological perspective.



 
Fails to provide a research question.



 
Application                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Outcomes
1, 3, 4                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
Student shows a sophisticated knowledge of research methodology in their ability to critically evaluate the research question; addresses flaws or concerns with the research literature.



 
Student correctly applies their knowledge of research methodology to interpret and integrate empirical information in relation to their target question.



 
Student is inaccurate in their application of research methodology OR fails to apply their knowledge to accurately address the target question.



 
Student unable to understand or interpret research methodology OR fails to apply research knowledge to the review of literature.



 
Whole Artifact                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
Outcomes
1, 3, 4                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
Student utilizes APA style throughout paper with fewer than 3 errors.



 
Student utilizes APA style for title page, citations, references and overall organization of information; student has 4-6 errors in technical use of APA style.



 
Student utilizes APA style but has 7 or more errors.



 
Student fails to use APA style.



 
Component                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
Outcomes
1, 3, 4                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
Body of literature review is 13 or more double-spaced pages, 1-inch margins, 12-point font (title and reference pages are additional)



 
Body of literature review is 10-12 double-spaced pages, 1-inch margins, 12-point font (title and reference pages are additional)



 
Body of literature review is 7-9 double-spaced pages, 1-inch margins, 12-point font (title and reference pages are additional) OR missing title/reference page



 
Body of literature review is less than 6 double-spaced pages, 1-inch margins, 12-point font (title and reference pages are additional)



 
M/LL Courses                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
Outcomes
1, 3, 4                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
Student provides insight beyond what is presented in the literature in examining the multicultural implications, findings and/or significance; highlights awareness of the research question in relation to contemporary issues.



 
Student accurately addresses the multicultural implications, findings and/or significance of their research question.



 
Student mentions multicultural implications but fails to elaborate on the implications, findings and/or significance OR student fails to show an accurate understanding of multicultural issues.



 
No mention of multicultural issues, implications or findings.



 

Copyright:

This material is protected by copyright and can not be reused without author permission.

Last Updated:5/8/2013 3:41:57 PM